000 | 04049cam a2200433 i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
005 | 20221102164716.0 | ||
008 | 091028t20122010enk b 001 0 eng d | ||
011 | _aBIB MATCHES WORLDCAT | ||
020 | _a1596916109 (alk. paper) | ||
020 | _a9781408824832 (alk. paper) | ||
035 | _a(ATU)b13029204 | ||
035 | _a(OCoLC)461631066 | ||
040 |
_aDLC _beng _erda _cDLC _dYDXCP _dUPZ _dIH9 _dJAI _dC#P _dBWX _dUKM _dCDX _dB2A _dVP@ _dFUG _dUKMGB _dLOY _dDAY _dBDX _dNSB _dGTA _dOCLCO _dATU |
||
050 | 0 | 0 |
_aQ147 _b.O74 2010 |
082 | 0 | 0 |
_a174.95 _222 |
100 | 1 |
_aOreskes, Naomi, _eauthor. _91033125 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aMerchants of doubt : _bhow a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming / _cNaomi Oreskes and Erik M. Conway. |
246 | 3 | 0 | _aHow a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming |
264 | 1 |
_aLondon : _bBloomsbury, _c2012. |
|
264 | 4 | _c©2010 | |
300 |
_a355 pages ; _c25 cm |
||
336 |
_atext _2rdacontent |
||
337 |
_aunmediated _2rdamedia |
||
338 |
_avolume _2rdacarrier |
||
504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 279-343) and index. | ||
505 | 0 | _aDoubt is our product -- Strategic defense, phony facts and the creation of the George C. Marshall Institute -- Sowing the seeds of doubt: acid rain -- Constructing a counter-narrative: the fight over the ozone hole -- What's bad science? Who decides? The fight over second-hand smoke -- The denial of global warming -- Denial rides again: the revisionist attack on Rachel Carson -- Of free markets and free speech -- A new view of science. | |
520 | _aThis book has been praised- and attacked- around the world, for reasons easy to understand. This book tells, with 'brutal clarity', the disquieting story of how a loose-knit group of high-level scientists and scientific advisers, with deep connections in politics and industry, ran effective campaigns to mislead the public and deny well-established scientific knowledge over four decades that link smoking to lung cancer, coal smoke to acid rain, and CFCs to the ozone hole. It is the troubling story of how a cadre of influential scientists have clouded public understanding of scientific facts to advance a political and economic agenda. The U.S. scientific community has long led the world in research on such areas as public health, environmental science, and issues affecting quality of life. Our scientists have produced landmark studies on the dangers of DDT, tobacco smoke, acid rain, and global warming. But at the same time, a small yet potent subset of this community leads the world in vehement denial of these dangers. Remarkably, the same individuals surface repeatedly, some of the same figures who have claimed that the science of global warming is "not settled" denied the truth of studies linking smoking to lung cancer, coal smoke to acid rain, and CFCs to the ozone hole. "Doubt is our product," wrote one tobacco executive. These "experts" supplied it. The authors, both historians of science, roll back the rug on this dark corner of the American scientific community, showing how ideology and corporate interests, aided by a too-compliant media, have skewed public understanding of some of the most pressing issues of our era. -- from Back Cover | ||
586 | _aHistory of Science Society, Watson Davis and Helen Miles Davis Prize Winner, 2011. | ||
650 | 0 |
_aScientists _xProfessional ethics _9783228 |
|
650 | 0 |
_aScience news _xMoral and ethical aspects _9748531 |
|
650 | 0 |
_aDemocracy and science _9344084 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aConway, Erik M., _d1965- _eauthor. _9833720 |
|
907 |
_a.b13029204 _b22-08-17 _c28-10-15 |
||
942 | _cB | ||
945 |
_a174.95 ORE _g1 _iA516028B _j0 _lnmain _o- _p$30.47 _q- _r- _s- _t0 _u2 _v0 _w0 _x0 _y.i13345357 _z29-10-15 |
||
945 |
_a174.95 ORE _g1 _iA516040B _j0 _lnmain _o- _p$30.47 _q- _r- _s- _t0 _u2 _v0 _w0 _x0 _y.i13345369 _z29-10-15 |
||
945 |
_a174.95 ORE _g1 _iA516032B _j0 _lnmain _o- _p$30.47 _q- _r- _s- _t0 _u0 _v0 _w0 _x0 _y.i13345370 _z29-10-15 |
||
998 |
_ab _an _b06-04-16 _cm _da _feng _genk _h0 |
||
999 |
_c1254083 _d1254083 |