000 | 06064cam a2200505 i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
005 | 20211104015929.0 | ||
008 | 090220s2009 ne b 001 0beng d | ||
010 | _a 2009287365 | ||
011 | _aBIB MATCHES WORLDCAT | ||
020 | _a9067042897 | ||
020 | _a9789067042895 | ||
035 | _a(ATU)b1158547x | ||
035 | _a(OCoLC)268793362 | ||
040 |
_aBTCTA _beng _erda _cBTCTA _dYDXCP _dYLS _dUKM _dCDX _dDLC _dIG# _dOHX _dNLA _dATU |
||
043 |
_ae------ _aae----- |
||
050 | 0 | 0 |
_aK2123 _b.L44 2009 |
082 | 0 | 4 |
_a347.012 _222 |
245 | 0 | 4 |
_aThe legitimacy of highest courts' rulings : _bjudicial deliberations and beyond / _cedited by Nick Huls, Maurice Adams, Jacco Bomhoff. |
264 | 1 |
_aThe Hague, The Netherlands : _bT.M.C. Asser Press, _c[2009] |
|
264 | 2 |
_aWest Nyack, NY : _bCambridge University Press [North American |
|
264 | 4 | _c©2009 | |
300 |
_axxi, 478 pages ; _c25 cm |
||
336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
337 |
_aunmediated _bn _2rdamedia |
||
338 |
_avolume _bnc _2rdacarrier |
||
504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references and index. | ||
505 | 0 | 0 |
_tIntroduction: from legitimacy to leadership / _rNick Huls -- _tTransforming deliberations / _rMitchel de S.-O-l'E. Lasser -- _tWhat do we lack? / _rUgo Mattei -- _tA socio-legal analysis of the legitimacy of highest courts / _rFred Bruinsma -- _tComparing judicial reasoning on a formalism/policy axis : problematizing and contextualizing 'formalism' in Mitchel Lasser's Judicial deliberations / _rJacco Bomhoff -- _t'In good faith' : re-imagining comparative law discourse / _rBram Goetschalckx -- _tFormal and substantial justification in legal decisions : some critical questions from an argumentative perspective / _rHarm Kloosterhuis -- _tFormal and informal determinative factors in the legitimacy of judicial decisions : the point of view of the French Court of Cassation / _rGuy Canivet -- _tBut Pasteur was French : comments on Mitchel Lasser's 'The European pasteurization of French law' / _rKoen Lemmens -- _tFiltering applications, number of judgments delivered and judicial discourse by supreme courts : some thoughts based on the French example / _rAndrea Pinna -- _tA commentary on Lasser's Analysis from the Belgian Court of Cassation's perspective / _rLuc Huybrechts -- _tLegitimacy and democracy through adjudication : comparative reflections on the argumentative practice of the French and Belgian Cour de cassation / _rMaurice Adams and Fernand Tanghe -- _tJudicial reasoning and legitimacy of the Dutch Supreme Court / _rWillibrord J.M. Davids -- _tThe legitimacy of the decisions of the Dutch Supreme Court in criminal cases / _rGeert Corstens -- _tThe perspective of the annotator : some observations about the organisation and format of the judgments and decisions of the criminal division of the Supreme Court of the Netherlands, and the role of the annotator / _rPaul Mevis -- _tThe perspective of a cassation attorney in criminal cases / _rRob Baumgardt -- _tLegitimacy of the ruling : a formal approach / _rCarel Smith -- _tCourts in a quest for legitimacy : a comparative approach / _rMarc A. Loth -- _tAnother turn of the screw : an evaluation of Lasser's Judicial deliberations in the light of the practices of constitutional review in France, Germany and the United States / _rElaine Mak -- _tFrom traditional judicial styles to Verdict Industries Inc. / _rRob Jagtenberg and Annie de Roo -- _tA comparison between wrongful dismissal cases in the Netherlands and California : a quest for transparency of judicial decisions / _rE. Grace van Arkel -- _tThe Dutch Supreme Court versus the lower courts : summary dismissal and the catalogue of viewpoints / _rKees Loonstra and Jeroen Quist -- _tFunctions of judicial opinion : a view from a post-Communist European state / _rSinis̆a Rodin -- _tJudicial deliberations : the Strasbourg perspective / _rLech Garlicki -- _tJudicial legitimacy in an internationalized world / _rWilhelmina Thomassen -- _tJudicial deliberations in the European Court of Human Rights / _rJanneke Gerards / _rLegitimacy of European Court of Human Rights judgments : procedural aspects / _rTom Barkhuysen and Michiel van Emmerik -- _tJudicial deliberations and human rights adjudication / _rRoel de Lange. |
520 | _a"In Judicial Deliberations: A Comparative Analysis of Judicial Transparency and Legitimacy (2004), the American-French scholar Mitchel Lasser has, among other things, tried to re-establish the strengths of the French cassation system. Using Lasser's approach and ideas as a starting point for this book, judges from the French, Belgian and Dutch Cassation Courts reflect on the challenges that their Courts are facing. Specific attention is also given to the Strasbourg Court on Human Rights, that has been so important for the moral legitimacy of the European legal order, and to courts in post-communist systems, which face many similar challenges and are under even greater pressure to modernise. The book is a multidisciplinary contribution to the international debate about the legitimacy of highest courts' rulings, the concept of judicial leadership, and offers a new perspective in the USA-versus-Europe debate."--Publisher description. | ||
588 | _aMachine converted from AACR2 source record. | ||
600 | 1 | 0 |
_aLasser, Mitchel de S.-O.-L'E. _tJudicial deliberations. |
650 | 0 |
_aCourts of last resort _9334544 |
|
650 | 0 |
_aCourts of last resort _zEurope _9580421 |
|
650 | 0 |
_aJudgments _9319699 |
|
650 | 0 |
_aJudgments _zEurope _9580423 |
|
650 | 0 |
_aJudicial process _9319702 |
|
650 | 0 |
_aJudicial process _zEurope _9579637 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aHuls, Nicolaas Jacob Herman, _d1949- _eeditor. _9268044 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aAdams, Maurice, _d1964- _eeditor. _9269589 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aBomhoff, J. _q(Jacco), _eeditor. _9268037 |
|
856 | 4 | 2 |
_3Contributor biographical information _uhttp://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0912/2009287365-b.html |
907 |
_a.b1158547x _b06-09-21 _c27-10-15 |
||
998 |
_a(3)b _a(3)c _b06-04-16 _cm _da _feng _gne _h4 |
||
945 |
_a347.012 LEG _g1 _iA469101B _j0 _lcmain _o- _p$154.34 _q- _r- _s- _t0 _u4 _v0 _w0 _x3 _y.i12937848 _z29-10-15 |
||
942 | _cB | ||
999 |
_c1201565 _d1201565 |