000 06064cam a2200505 i 4500
005 20211104015929.0
008 090220s2009 ne b 001 0beng d
010 _a 2009287365
011 _aBIB MATCHES WORLDCAT
020 _a9067042897
020 _a9789067042895
035 _a(ATU)b1158547x
035 _a(OCoLC)268793362
040 _aBTCTA
_beng
_erda
_cBTCTA
_dYDXCP
_dYLS
_dUKM
_dCDX
_dDLC
_dIG#
_dOHX
_dNLA
_dATU
043 _ae------
_aae-----
050 0 0 _aK2123
_b.L44 2009
082 0 4 _a347.012
_222
245 0 4 _aThe legitimacy of highest courts' rulings :
_bjudicial deliberations and beyond /
_cedited by Nick Huls, Maurice Adams, Jacco Bomhoff.
264 1 _aThe Hague, The Netherlands :
_bT.M.C. Asser Press,
_c[2009]
264 2 _aWest Nyack, NY :
_bCambridge University Press [North American
264 4 _c©2009
300 _axxi, 478 pages ;
_c25 cm
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _aunmediated
_bn
_2rdamedia
338 _avolume
_bnc
_2rdacarrier
504 _aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505 0 0 _tIntroduction: from legitimacy to leadership /
_rNick Huls --
_tTransforming deliberations /
_rMitchel de S.-O-l'E. Lasser --
_tWhat do we lack? /
_rUgo Mattei --
_tA socio-legal analysis of the legitimacy of highest courts /
_rFred Bruinsma --
_tComparing judicial reasoning on a formalism/policy axis : problematizing and contextualizing 'formalism' in Mitchel Lasser's Judicial deliberations /
_rJacco Bomhoff --
_t'In good faith' : re-imagining comparative law discourse /
_rBram Goetschalckx --
_tFormal and substantial justification in legal decisions : some critical questions from an argumentative perspective /
_rHarm Kloosterhuis --
_tFormal and informal determinative factors in the legitimacy of judicial decisions : the point of view of the French Court of Cassation /
_rGuy Canivet --
_tBut Pasteur was French : comments on Mitchel Lasser's 'The European pasteurization of French law' /
_rKoen Lemmens --
_tFiltering applications, number of judgments delivered and judicial discourse by supreme courts : some thoughts based on the French example /
_rAndrea Pinna --
_tA commentary on Lasser's Analysis from the Belgian Court of Cassation's perspective /
_rLuc Huybrechts --
_tLegitimacy and democracy through adjudication : comparative reflections on the argumentative practice of the French and Belgian Cour de cassation /
_rMaurice Adams and Fernand Tanghe --
_tJudicial reasoning and legitimacy of the Dutch Supreme Court /
_rWillibrord J.M. Davids --
_tThe legitimacy of the decisions of the Dutch Supreme Court in criminal cases /
_rGeert Corstens --
_tThe perspective of the annotator : some observations about the organisation and format of the judgments and decisions of the criminal division of the Supreme Court of the Netherlands, and the role of the annotator /
_rPaul Mevis --
_tThe perspective of a cassation attorney in criminal cases /
_rRob Baumgardt --
_tLegitimacy of the ruling : a formal approach /
_rCarel Smith --
_tCourts in a quest for legitimacy : a comparative approach /
_rMarc A. Loth --
_tAnother turn of the screw : an evaluation of Lasser's Judicial deliberations in the light of the practices of constitutional review in France, Germany and the United States /
_rElaine Mak --
_tFrom traditional judicial styles to Verdict Industries Inc. /
_rRob Jagtenberg and Annie de Roo --
_tA comparison between wrongful dismissal cases in the Netherlands and California : a quest for transparency of judicial decisions /
_rE. Grace van Arkel --
_tThe Dutch Supreme Court versus the lower courts : summary dismissal and the catalogue of viewpoints /
_rKees Loonstra and Jeroen Quist --
_tFunctions of judicial opinion : a view from a post-Communist European state /
_rSinis̆a Rodin --
_tJudicial deliberations : the Strasbourg perspective /
_rLech Garlicki --
_tJudicial legitimacy in an internationalized world /
_rWilhelmina Thomassen --
_tJudicial deliberations in the European Court of Human Rights /
_rJanneke Gerards /
_rLegitimacy of European Court of Human Rights judgments : procedural aspects /
_rTom Barkhuysen and Michiel van Emmerik --
_tJudicial deliberations and human rights adjudication /
_rRoel de Lange.
520 _a"In Judicial Deliberations: A Comparative Analysis of Judicial Transparency and Legitimacy (2004), the American-French scholar Mitchel Lasser has, among other things, tried to re-establish the strengths of the French cassation system. Using Lasser's approach and ideas as a starting point for this book, judges from the French, Belgian and Dutch Cassation Courts reflect on the challenges that their Courts are facing. Specific attention is also given to the Strasbourg Court on Human Rights, that has been so important for the moral legitimacy of the European legal order, and to courts in post-communist systems, which face many similar challenges and are under even greater pressure to modernise. The book is a multidisciplinary contribution to the international debate about the legitimacy of highest courts' rulings, the concept of judicial leadership, and offers a new perspective in the USA-versus-Europe debate."--Publisher description.
588 _aMachine converted from AACR2 source record.
600 1 0 _aLasser, Mitchel de S.-O.-L'E.
_tJudicial deliberations.
650 0 _aCourts of last resort
_9334544
650 0 _aCourts of last resort
_zEurope
_9580421
650 0 _aJudgments
_9319699
650 0 _aJudgments
_zEurope
_9580423
650 0 _aJudicial process
_9319702
650 0 _aJudicial process
_zEurope
_9579637
700 1 _aHuls, Nicolaas Jacob Herman,
_d1949-
_eeditor.
_9268044
700 1 _aAdams, Maurice,
_d1964-
_eeditor.
_9269589
700 1 _aBomhoff, J.
_q(Jacco),
_eeditor.
_9268037
856 4 2 _3Contributor biographical information
_uhttp://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0912/2009287365-b.html
907 _a.b1158547x
_b06-09-21
_c27-10-15
998 _a(3)b
_a(3)c
_b06-04-16
_cm
_da
_feng
_gne
_h4
945 _a347.012 LEG
_g1
_iA469101B
_j0
_lcmain
_o-
_p$154.34
_q-
_r-
_s-
_t0
_u4
_v0
_w0
_x3
_y.i12937848
_z29-10-15
942 _cB
999 _c1201565
_d1201565