000 14841cam a2200445 i 4500
005 20221101221407.0
008 081219s2008 enk bf 001 0 eng d
011 _aBIB MATCHES WORLDCAT
020 _a184113824X
_qhbk.
020 _a9781841138244
_qhbk.
035 _a(ATU)b11463077
035 _a(OCoLC)244652718
040 _aUKM
_beng
_erda
_cUKM
_dBWKUK
_dBWK
_dBWX
_dOCoLC
_dATU
050 4 _aKD4902
_b.F67 2008
082 0 4 _a347.42012
_222
100 1 _aFordham, Michael,
_eauthor.
_91074092
245 1 0 _aJudicial review handbook /
_cby Michael Fordham ; foreword by Lord Woolf.
250 _aFifth edition.
264 1 _aOxford ;
_aPortland, Or. :
_bHart,
_c[2008]
264 4 _c©2008
300 _axix, 847 pages ;
_c25 cm
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _aunmediated
_bn
_2rdamedia
338 _avolume
_bnc
_2rdacarrier
500 _aPrevious ed.: 2004.
504 _aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505 0 0 _gSection A.
_tNature of Judicial Review --
_gPart 1.
_tPractical Steps --
_g1.1.
_tBasic steps in a judicial review case --
_gPart 2.
_tSupervisory Jurisdiction --
_g2.1.
_tSupervising public authorities --
_g2.2.
_tImportance and range of subject-matter --
_g2.3.
_tTerminology --
_g2.4.
_tThe Administrative Court --
_g2.5.
_tSome special procedural aspects --
_g2.6.
_tStrict case-management --
_gPart 3.
_tImpact --
_g3.1.
_tRemittal and repeatability --
_g3.2.
_tSterile /counterproductive victories --
_g3.3.
_tJudicial review as a monetary springboard --
_g3.4.
_tSecuring assurances /provoking comment --
_g3.5.
_tWider impact /knock-on effect --
_gPart 4.
_tMateriality --
_g4.1.
_tPractical substance and judicial review --
_g4.2.
_tMateriality /material flaw --
_g4.3.
_tLack of prejudice --
_g4.4.
_tFutility --
_g4.5.
_tDangers of materiality, prejudice and futility --
_g4.6.
_tHypothetical /academic issues --
_g4.7.
_tPrematurity --
_gPart 5.
_tTargets --
_g5.1.
_tJudicial review and “decisions” --
_g5.2.
_tSpectrum of possible targets --
_g5.3.
_tMultiple targets /target-selection --
_gPart 6.
_tPower Sources --
_g6.1.
_tPowers /duties: basic sources and hierarchy --
_g6.2.
_tPolicy guidance --
_g6.3.
_tInternational law --
_gPart 7.
_tConstitutional Fundamentals --
_g7.1.
_tLegislative supremacy --
_g7.2.
_tRule of law /separation of powers --
_g7.3.
_tPrinciples of legality --
_g7.4.
_tAccess to justice --
_g7.5.
_tConstitutional /common law rights --
_g7.6.
_tBasic fairness --
_g7.7.
_tBasic reasonableness --
_gPart 8.
_tEc Law --
_g8.1.
_tEC law supremacy --
_g8.2.
_tEC Treaty rights --
_g8.3.
_tJudicial review for EC-incompatibility --
_g8.4.
_tArticle 234 references to the ECJ --
_g8.5.
_tEC law damages /reparation --
_gPart 9.
_tThe Hra --
_g9.1.
_tHRA: key features and themes --
_g9.2.
_tCodified Convention rights --
_g9.3.
_tHRA ss.3 - 4: legislative compatibility /DOI --
_g9.4.
_tHRA s.6: compatible public authority action --
_g9.5.
_tHRA just satisfaction --
_gPart 10.
_tCooperation& Candour --
_g10.1.
_tA cooperative enterprise --
_g10.2.
_tADR /mediation --
_g10.3.
_tClaimant's duty of candour --
_g10.4.
_tDefendant /interested party's duty of candour --
_gPart 11.
_tPrecedent& Authority --
_g11.1.
_tUse of case-law --
_g11.2.
_tAcademic commentary /comparative case-law --
_gPart 12.
_tVigilance --
_g12.1.
_tJudicial review and the rule of law --
_g12.2.
_tAbuse Models --
_gPart 13.
_tRestraint --
_g13.1.
_t“Soft” review: reasonableness --
_g13.2.
_tRestraint and factual questions --
_g13.3.
_tRestraint and discretion /judgment --
_g13.4.
_tRestraint and expertise --
_g13.5.
_tJudicial restraint in action --
_g13.6.
_tProtecting public authorities --
_g13.7.
_tReview from the decision-maker's point of view --
_gPart 14.
_tBalancing --
_g14.1.
_tJudicial review and striking a balance --
_g14.2.
_tStriking a balance: grounds for judicial review --
_g14.3.
_tHolding the balance: nothing personal --
_g14.4.
_tConvenience and floodgates --
_gPart 15.
_tThe Forbidden Method --
_g15.1.
_t“Soft” review: the forbidden substitutionary approach --
_g15.2.
_t“Not an appeal” --
_g15.3.
_t“Legality not correctness” --
_g15.4.
_t“Not the merits” --
_g15.5.
_t“Court does not substitute its own judgment” --
_gPart 16.
_tHard-Edged Questions --
_g16.1.
_tHard-edged review: correctness --
_g16.2.
_tPrecedent fact --
_g16.3.
_tError of law as hard-edged review --
_g16.4.
_tInterpretation as a hard-edged question --
_g16.5.
_tProcedural fairness as hard-edged review --
_g16.6.
_tHard-edged review: further matters --
_gPart 17.
_tEvidence and Fact --
_g17.1.
_tJudicial review evidence --
_g17.2.
_tFresh evidence in judicial review --
_g17.3.
_tJudicial review and factual disputes --
_g17.4.
_tDisclosure, further information and cross-examination --
_gPart 18.
_tCosts --
_g18.1.
_tCosts: general matters --
_g18.2.
_tSummary assessment /detailed assessment of costs --
_g18.3.
_tCosts and the permission stage --
_g18.4.
_tCosts and the public interest --
_g18.5.
_tCosts and discontinuance /early disposal --
_g18.6.
_tSpecial costs responses --
_gPart 19.
_tMaking the Claim --
_g19.1.
_tPre-claim steps --
_g19.2.
_tMaking the claim --
_g19.3.
_tAcknowledging the claim --
_gPart 20.
_tInterim Remedies --
_g20.1.
_tInterim remedies --
_g20.2.
_tThe balance of convenience --
_gPart 21.
_tPermission --
_g21.1.
_tGranting or refusing permission --
_g21.2.
_tCase-management at the permission stage --
_gPart 22.
_tSubstantive Hearing --
_g22.1.
_tPost-permission /pre-hearing steps --
_g22.2.
_tThird party participation --
_g22.3.
_tDisposal without a hearing --
_g22.4.
_tThe substantive hearing --
_gPart 23.
_tAppeal --
_g23.1.
_tPermission appeal --
_g23.2.
_tSubstantive appeal --
_gPart 24.
_tRemedies --
_g24.1.
_tUnified remedies --
_g24.2.
_tThe declaration --
_g24.3.
_tRemedy as a discretionary matter --
_g24.4.
_tThe remedies in action --
_gPart 25.
_tMonetary Remedies --
_g25.1.
_tAvailability of debt, restitution and damages --
_g25.2.
_tNo damages for maladministration --
_g25.3.
_tRecognised species of reparation claim --
505 8 0 _gSection B.
_tParameters of Judicial Review --
_gPart 26.
_tDelay --
_g26.1.
_tThe approach to delay --
_g26.2.
_tPromptness and the running of time --
_g26.3.
_tGood reason to extend time --
_g26.4.
_tHardship, prejudice and detriment --
_gPart 27.
_tPublic /Private --
_g27.1.
_tThe public /private distinction --
_g27.2.
_tPublic law principles outside CPR 54 --
_g27.3.
_tProcedural exclusivity: abuse of process --
_gPart 28.
_tOuster --
_g28.1.
_tThe approach to legislative preclusive clauses --
_g28.2.
_tTime-limit ousters --
_gPart 29.
_tInterpretation --
_g29.1.
_tThe purposive approach to interpretation --
_g29.2.
_tLegislative purpose and judicial review --
_g29.3.
_tStatutory interpretation --
_g29.4.
_tUsing Hansard --
_g29.5.
_tInterpreting other sources --
_gPart 30.
_tFunction --
_g30.1.
_tUnderstanding the defendant's function --
_g30.2.
_tTraditional functional labels --
_g30.3.
_tThe judicial /administrative distinction --
_g30.4.
_tOther aspects of function --
_gPart 31.
_tContext --
_g31.1.
_tContextualism --
_g31.2.
_tCircumstances --
_g31.3.
_tCharacteristics and conduct of the claimant --
_g31.4.
_tClaimant's failure to complain /raise the concern at the time --
_g31.5.
_tThe Court's controlling discretion /judgment --
_g31.6.
_t“Flexi-principles” --
_gPart 32.
_tModified Review --
_g32.1.
_tPart-reviewability of Crown Courts --
_g32.2.
_tJudicial review of decisions regarding legal process --
_g32.3.
_tAnxious scrutiny --
_g32.4.
_tOther modified review situations --
_gPart 33.
_tFlux --
_g33.1.
_tThe developing law --
_g33.2.
_tLessons from the past --
_g33.3.
_t“Two-stage” approaches to legal development --
_g33.4.
_tForecasting --
_gPart 34.
_tReviewability --
_g34.1.
_tSurveying the field --
_g34.2.
_tPrinciples of reviewability --
_g34.3.
_tConquests of reviewability --
_gPart 35.
_tNon-Reviewability --
_g35.1.
_tSpecial functions and immunity from review --
_g35.2.
_tPrivate law matters --
_gPart 36.
_tAlternative Remedy --
_g36.1.
_tGeneral effect of other safeguards --
_g36.2.
_tExclusive alternative remedy --
_g36.3.
_tAlternative remedy and discretion /case-management --
_g36.4.
_tOther remedy curing public law wrong --
_gPart 37.
_tProportionality Template --
_g37.1.
_tProportionality principles --
_gPart 38.
_tStanding --
_g38.1.
_tThe requirement of sufficient interest --
_g38.2.
_tThe approach to sufficient interest --
_g38.3.
_tStanding at the permission /substantive stages --
_g38.4.
_tStanding under the HRA: the victim test --
_gPart 39.
_tDiscretion /Duty --
_g39.1.
_tNo unfettered powers --
_g39.2.
_tDiscretion /power: the essential duties --
_g39.3.
_tDiscretion and duty in action --
_gPart 40.
_tInalienability --
_g40.1.
_tPreservation of powers and duties --
_g40.2.
_tInalienability and estoppel /legitimate expectation --
_gPart 41.
_tLegitimate Expectation --
_g41.1.
_tThe role of legitimate expectation --
_g41.2.
_tBasic anatomy of a legitimate expectation --
_gPart 42.
_tOnus --
_g42.1.
_tOnus generally on the claimant --
_g42.2.
_tOnus on the defendant in particular contexts --
_gPart 43.
_tSeverance --
_g43.1.
_tSeverability --
_gPart 44.
_tNullity --
_g44.1.
_tInvalidity labels --
_g44.2.
_tFlaws constituting “nullity” --
_g44.3.
_tPurpose /effect of “nullity” --
505 8 0 _gSection C.
_tGrounds for Judicial Review --
_gPart 45.
_tClassifying Grounds --
_g45.1.
_tThe conventional threefold division --
_g45.2.
_tRoot concepts and unifying themes --
_g45.3.
_tReviewing discretion: Wednesbury and abuse of power --
_g45.4.
_tOverlapping grounds and interchangeable labels --
_gPart 46.
_tUltra Vires --
_g46.1.
_tBasic meanings of ultra vires --
_g46.2.
_tRights-violation as ultra vires: the principle of legality --
_g46.3.
_tInterpretation to allow validity: reading down /reading in --
_gPart 47.
_tJurisdictional Error --
_g47.1.
_tJurisdiction /jurisdictional error as a flexi-principle --
_g47.2.
_tJurisdictional error as hard-edged review (correctness) --
_g47.3.
_tError of law and jurisdictional error --
_gPart 48.
_tError of Law --
_g48.1.
_tError of law /misdirection in law --
_g48.2.
_tError of law: restricted categories --
_gPart 49.
_tError of Fact --
_g49.1.
_tPrecendent Fact --
_g49.2.
_tFundamental error of fact --
_gPart 50.
_tAbdication /Fetter --
_g50.1.
_tBasic duty not to abdicate /fetter --
_g50.2.
_tActing under dictation --
_g50.3.
_tImproper delegation --
_g50.4.
_tFetter by inflexible policy --
_gPart 51.
_tInsufficient Inquiry --
_g51.1.
_tDuty of sufficient inquiry --
_g51.2.
_tWhether material fairly presented /properly addressed --
_gPart 52.
_tBad Faith /Improper Motive --
_g52.1.
_tBad faith --
_g52.2.
_tImproper motive --
_gPart 53.
_tFrustrating the Legislative Purpose --
_g53.1.
_tDuty to promote the legislative purpose --
_gPart 54.
_tSubstantive Unfairness --
_g54.1.
_tSubstantive unfairness --
_g54.2.
_tUnjustified breach of a substantive legitimate expectation --
_gPart 55.
_tInconsistency --
_g55.1.
_tEqual treatment, non-arbitrariness and certainty --
_g55.2.
_tUnjustified departure --
_gPart 56.
_tRelevancy /Irrelevancy --
_g56.1.
_tThe relevancy /irrelevancy principle --
_g56.2.
_tObligatory and discretionary relevance --
_g56.3.
_tRelevance and weight --
_gPart 57.
_tUnreasonableness --
_g57.1.
_tThe unreasonableness principle --
_g57.2.
_tHigh threshold epithets --
_g57.3.
_tSpecies of unreasonableness --
_g57.4.
_tUnreasonableness in action --
_gPart 58.
_tProportionality --
_g58.1.
_tProportionality and the common law --
_g58.2.
_tProportionality as part of reasonableness --
_g58.3.
_tCommon law proportionality: rights and penalties --
_g58.4.
_tProportionality and scrutiny of evidence /reasoning --
_g58.5.
_tLatitude and intensity of review --
_gPart 59.
_tHra-Violation --
_g59.1.
_tTesting for an HRA-violation --
_g59.2.
_tArticle 2: life --
_g59.3.
_tArticle 3: cruelty --
_g59.4.
_tArticle 5: liberty --
_g59.5.
_tArticle 6: fair-hearing --
_g59.6.
_tArticle 8: privacy --
_g59.7.
_tArticle 10: expression --
_g59.8.
_tArticle 14: non-discrimination --
_g59.9.
_tArticle 1P: property-interference --
_g59.10.
_tFurther Convention rights and provisions --
_gPart 60.
_tProcedural Unfairness --
_g60.1.
_tThe basic concept of fairness --
_g60.2.
_tProcedural fairness as a flexi-principle --
_g60.3.
_tProcedural fairness: supplementing the legislative scheme --
_g60.4.
_tProcedural ultra vires --
_g60.5.
_tThe basic right to be heard --
_g60.6.
_tAdequate consultation --
_g60.7.
_tThe basic right to be informed --
_g60.8.
_tOther rights of procedural fairness --
_gPart 61.
_tBias --
_g61.1.
_tAutomatic disqualification --
_g61.2.
_tActual bias --
_g61.3.
_tApparent bias --
_gPart 62.
_tReasons --
_g62.1.
_tImportance of reasons in the developing law --
_g62.2.
_tJudicial review for failure to give reasons --
_g62.3.
_tAdequacy of reasons --
_g62.4.
_tTiming of reasons --
_g62.5.
_tRemedy for lack /insufficiency of reasons --
_gPart 63.
_tExternal Wrongs --
_g63.1.
_tExternal wrongs --
505 8 0 _gSection D.
_tMaterials --
_g64.1.
_tSupreme Court Act 1981 s.31 --
_g64.2.
_tCivil Procedure Rules PART 54(I) --
_g64.3.
_tCivil Procedure Rules PART 54 Practice Direction --
_g64.4.
_tAdministrative Court Office Notes for Guidance --
_g64.5.
_tJudicial Review Pre-Action Protocol --
_g64.6.
_tJudicial Review Urgent Cases Procedure --
_g64.7.
_tHuman Rights Act 1998 --
_g64.8.
_tForm N461 --
_g64.9.
_tForm N462 --
_g64.10.
_tForm N463 --
_g64.11.
_tA List of Articles.
520 _a"The Judicial Review Handbook is one of the leading works in public law, an indispensable source of reference and a guide to the burgeoning case law in judicial review. Established as an essential part of the library of any practitioner engaged in public law cases, the Judicial Review Handbook offers unrivalled coverage of administrative law, including, but not confined to the work of the Administrative Court and its procedures. But as anyone who has used the previous editions will acknowledge, it is much more than that. The completely revised and up-dated fifth edition is once again structured around 63 unique legal principles supported by a compendious compilation of sources and an unequalled selection of reported case quotations. It also includes essential procedural rules, forms and guidance issued by the Administrative Court. This edition builds on previous editions with deepened coverage of the impact on judicial review of both the Civil Procedure Rules and the Human Rights Act 1998 which, at the time of the previous edition, were both new arrivals in English law. Their impact, and the plethora of cases which explore their meaning and application, are fully analysed and evaluated by Michael Fordham, and quotations from the cases incorporated into the unique appendices of case extracts."--Publisher's website.
588 _aMachine converted from AACR2 source record.
650 0 _aJudicial review
_zEngland
_9722771
650 0 _aJudicial review
_zWales
_9722787
650 0 _aJudicial review of administrative acts
_zGreat Britain
_vDigests
_9743616
907 _a.b11463077
_b03-10-17
_c27-10-15
942 _cB
945 _a347.42012 FOR
_g1
_iA468348B
_j0
_lcmain
_o-
_p$288.80
_q-
_r-
_s-
_t0
_u4
_v0
_w0
_x0
_y.i12918696
_z29-10-15
998 _ab
_ac
_b06-04-16
_cm
_da
_feng
_genk
_h0
999 _c1194993
_d1194993