000 | 06521cam a2200361 i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
005 | 20211129151441.0 | ||
008 | 010101s2008 maua b 001 0 eng d | ||
010 | _a 2008002152 | ||
011 | _aBIB MATCHES WORLDCAT | ||
020 |
_a0674030761 _qalk. paper |
||
020 |
_a9780674030763 _qalk. paper |
||
035 | _a(OCoLC)191732296 | ||
040 |
_aDLC _beng _erda _cDLC _dBTCTA _dBAKER _dYDXCP _dUKM _dC#P _dBWX _dIXA _dCDX _dNLGGC _dMUQ _dATU |
||
050 | 0 | 0 |
_aHM821 _b.C65 2008 |
082 | 0 | 0 |
_a305.01 _222 |
100 | 1 |
_aCohen, G. A. _q(Gerald Allan), _d1941-2009, _eauthor. _9311573 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aRescuing justice and equality / _cG.A. Cohen. |
264 | 1 |
_aCambridge, Mass. : _bHarvard University Press, _c2008. |
|
300 |
_axvii, 430 pages : _billustrations ; _c25 cm |
||
336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
337 |
_aunmediated _bn _2rdamedia |
||
338 |
_avolume _bnc _2rdacarrier |
||
504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 413-421) and index. | ||
505 | 0 | 0 |
_tPreface -- _tIntroduction -- _tThe Big Issue -- _tRescuing Equality and Justice -- _tSome Methodological Disagreements -- _tJustice and Fairness -- _tThe Two Standpoints -- _tThe Greatness of John Rawls -- _tAn Outline of the Book -- _gPart One. _tRescuing Equality from -- _g1. _tThe Incentives Argument -- _gI. _tThe Incentives Argument, The Interpersonal Test, and Community -- _tIncentives, the Difference Principle, and Equality -- _tNigel Lawson's Tax Cut -- _tOn Uttering Arguments in Variable Interpersonal Settings -- _tThe Kidnapper's Argument -- _tCommunity, and the Interpersonal Test -- _tDoes the Incentive Argument Pass the Interpersonal Test? -- _gII. _tTesting the Incentive Argument -- _tWhat Makes the Minor Premiss of the Incentive Argument True? -- _tWhy the Incentive Argument Fails the Interpersonal Test -- _tThe Incentive Argument and Bad Faith -- _tShould the Poor Reject the Incentive Argument? -- _tFirst Persons and Third Persons -- _gIII. _tIncentives and the Difference Principle -- _tStrict and Lax Readings of the Difference Principle -- _tWhy Just People Must Practise the Strict Difference Principle -- _tThe Difference Principle and 'daily Life' -- _tDignity, Fraternity, and The Difference Principle -- _tThe Difference Principle and 'Mutual Indifference' -- _tThe Difference Principle and the Unjust Society -- _g2. _tThe Pareto Argument for Inequality -- _tIntroduction -- _tThe Argument Expounded -- _tTheArgument Challenged -- _tThe Argument Rejected -- _gLab our. _tBurden in the Metric of Equality -- _tInconsistent Metrics -- _tRaising the Baseline -- _tImpartiality and Mutual Advantage -- _tInequality: A Necessary Evil? -- _tConclusion -- _g3. _tThe Basic Structure Objection -- _tIncentives and the Difference Principle: A Review of the Argument -- _tThe 'Basic Structure' Objection -- _tThe 'Basic Structure' Objection: A Preliminary Reply -- _tThe 'Basic Structure' Objection: A More Fundamental Reply -- _tWho is to Blame? -- _tCoercive and Non-Coercive Social Structures -- _gAppendix I. _tMore on Coercion and the Basic Structure -- _gAppendix II. _tThe Basic Structure is a Structure -- _g4. _tThe Difference Principle -- _tIntroduction -- _tReconsidering the Difference Principle -- _tThe Moral Arbitrariness Case for the Difference Principle Contradicts its Content -- _tA Recent Argument for the Difference Principle -- _tA Contractarian Argument for the Difference Principle -- _tWhat is the Moral Arbitrariness of Talent Differences Supposed to Show? -- _tChamberlain and Pareto -- _tHuman Nature and Constructivism -- _g5. _tThe Freedom Objection -- _tIntroduction -- _tEquality, Pareto, and Freedom of Choice of Occupatio Freedom in Work -- _tThe Unequal-Income Inference -- _tBlood, Kidneys, and Sex -- _g6. _tThe Facts -- _tA Statement of my Thesis -- _tFacts, and Some Meta-Ethical Questions -- _tWhat Most Philosophers Think about Facts and Principles -- _tMy Thesis: Ultimate Principles are Fact-Insensitive -- _tAnd the Clarity of Mind Requirement -- _tAn Illustration of the Thesis -- _tMore Illustration of the Thesis -- _tThe Argument for the Thesis -- _gI. _tA Defence of the First Premiss of the Argument -- _gII. _tA Defence of the Second Premiss of the Argument -- _gIII. _tA Defence of the Third Premiss of the Argument -- _tStill Further Illustration and Defence of the Thesis -- _tThe Clarity of Mind Requirement -- _tThe Merely Logical Priority of Fact-Insensitive Principles -- _tThe Conditional Character of the Thesis -- _tOn 'Is' and 'Ought' -- _tOn 'Ought' and 'Can' -- _tPossible Misunderstandings of the Thesis -- _tThe Thesis is not a Causal Thesis -- _tThe Thesis is not a Psychological Thesis -- _tThe Thesis is Neutral with Respect to Central Meta-Ethical Disputes -- _tSome Bad Rawlsian Arguments that Reject My Thesis -- _tUtilitarianism, and the Difference Between Fundamental Principles and Rules of Regulation -- _tThe Interest of My Thesis -- _tAppendix: God -- _gPart Two. _tRescuin Overview -- _tFundamental Principles of Justice and Constructivism -- _tFundamental Principles of Justice and Constructivism: Matters Arising -- _tIs Justice the First Virtue of Social Institutions? -- _tTwo Illustrations: Social Insurance, Property Taxation -- _tJustice and the Pareto Principle -- _tJustice, and Constraints, Notably Publicity, on Choice of Optimal Rules at Regulation -- _tJustice and Stability -- _tThe 'Circumstances of Justice' -- _tConclusion -- _tAppendix: Is the Original Position Justification of Principles Contractarian? -- _g8. _tThe Publicity Argument -- _tAndrew Williams on Publicity and the Egalitarian Ethos -- _tAn Anatomy of Williams's Argument -- _tRacism, Justice, and Assurance -- _tDoes Assurance Williams-type Determinacy? -- _tDoes Justice Require Precision? -- _tEgalitarian Ethi at Home, in the Market, and in the State -- _tPublicity as a Desideratum of Justice -- _tJustice and Occupational Choice -- _tConclusion -- _tGeneral Appendix: Replies to critics -- _tPublic and Private Action -- _tThe Site of Justice is not Where it Gets Caused -- _tPrior Principles, Self-Respect, and Equality -- _tIncentives and Prerogatives -- _tPogge's Mastergoals and Supergoals -- _tPogge's Failure to Address the Standard Case -- _tThe Currency of Distributive Justice and Incentive Inequality. |
588 | _aMachine converted from AACR2 source record. | ||
650 | 0 |
_aEquality _9353036 |
|
650 | 0 |
_aSocial justice. _9353297 |
|
650 | 0 |
_aCommunism. _9315794 |
|
907 |
_a.b11440041 _b11-07-17 _c27-10-15 |
||
942 | _cB | ||
945 |
_a305.01 COH _g1 _iA379320B _j0 _lnmain _o- _p$66.68 _q- _r- _s- _t0 _u3 _v1 _w0 _x1 _y.i12881156 _z29-10-15 |
||
998 |
_ab _an _b06-04-16 _cm _da _feng _gmau _h0 |
||
999 |
_c1193138 _d1193138 |