000			03076cam a2200397 i 4500
005			20211104082054.0
008			000629s2000 enk b 000 0 eng d
010			_a 00344661
011			_aBIB MATCHES WORLDCAT
020			_a1841131059 _qacid-free paper
020			_a9781841131054 _qacid-free paper
035			_a(ATU)b11332384
035			_a(OCoLC)44708385
040			_aDLC _beng _erda _cDLC _dUKM _dNLGGC _dBAKER _dBTCTA _dYDXCP _dATU
042			_apcc
043			_ae-uk---
050	0	0	_aKD4902 _b.J83 2000
082	0	0	_a347.41012 _221
245	0	0	_aJudicial review and the constitution / _cedited by Christopher Forsyth.
246	1	8	_aJudicial review & the constitution
264		1	_aOxford ; _aPortland, Or. : _bHart Pub., _c2000.
300			_axxxvii, 442 pages ; _c24 cm
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_aunmediated _bn _2rdamedia
338			_avolume _bnc _2rdacarrier
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references.
505	0	0	_tAcknowledgements -- _tList of Contributors -- _tList of Participants -- _tTable of Cases -- _tTable of Legislation -- _g1. _tIs the Ultra Vires Rule the Basis of Judicial Review? -- _g2. _tOf Fig Leaves and Fairy Tales: The Ultra Vires Doctrine, the Sovereignty of Parliament and Judicial Review -- _g3. _tUltra Vires and the Foundations of Judicial Review -- _g4. _tIllegality: The Problem of Jurisdiction -- _g5. _tThe Ultra Vires Doctrine in a Constitutional Setting: Still the Central Principle of Administrative Law -- _g6. _tUltra Vires and Institutional Interdependence -- _g7. _tForm and Substance in the Rule of Law: A Democratic Justification for Judicial Review -- _g8. _tJudicial Review and the Meaning of Law -- _g9. _tThe Foundations of Review, Devolved Power and Delegated Power -- _g10. _tThe Courts, Devolution and Judicial Review -- _g11. _tConvention Rights and Substantive Ultra Vires -- _g12. _tFundamental Rights as Interpretative Constructs: The Constitutional -- _g13. _tPublic Power and Private Power -- _g14. _tReview of (Non-Statutory) Discretions -- _g15. _tOf Vires and Vacuums: The Constitutional Context of Judicial Review -- _g16. _tLegislative Intention Versus Judicial Creativity? Administrative Law as a Co-operative Endeavour -- _g17. _tCompeting Models of Judicial Review -- _g18. _tHeat and Light: A Plea for Reconciliation -- _tComments from some Participants -- _tThe Rule of Law as the Foundation of Judicial Review -- _tJudicial Review in a Modern Context -- _tNo Need for a Single Foundation -- _tWhither the Constitution? -- _tUltra Vires as Distraction -- _tConstitutional Realities and Judicial Prudence -- _tIndex.
588			_aMachine converted from AACR2 source record.
650		0	_aJudicial review of administrative acts _zGreat Britain _9647340
700	1		_aForsyth, C. F., _eeditor. _9252066
710	2		_aUniversity of Cambridge. _bCentre for Public Law. _9300120
907			_a.b11332384 _b22-08-17 _c27-10-15
998			_ab _ac _b06-04-16 _cm _da _feng _genk _h0
945			_a347.41012 JUD _g1 _iA375886B _j0 _lcmain _o- _p$126.76 _q- _r- _s- _t0 _u7 _v4 _w0 _x3 _y.i12710702 _z29-10-15
942			_cB
999			_c1184176 _d1184176