000 | 03534cam a22004574i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
005 | 20221101183245.0 | ||
008 | 050516s2005 enk b 001 0 eng d | ||
010 | _a 2004046885 | ||
011 | _aBIB MATCHES WORLDCAT | ||
020 |
_a0714684880 _qalk. paper |
||
020 |
_a9780714684888 _qalk. paper |
||
020 |
_a0714655961 _qpb _qalk. paper |
||
020 |
_a9780714655963 _qpb _qalk. paper |
||
035 | _a(ATU)b11040658 | ||
035 | _a(DLC) 2004046885 | ||
035 | _a(OCoLC)55078125 | ||
040 |
_aDLC _beng _erda _dATU |
||
042 | _apcc | ||
050 | 0 | 0 |
_aJZ6374 _b.P65 2005 |
082 | 0 | 0 |
_a341.584 _222 |
245 | 0 | 4 |
_aThe politics of peacekeeping in the post-cold war era / _ceditors, David S. Sorenson and Pia Christina Wood. |
264 | 1 |
_aLondon ; _aNew York : _bF. Cass, _c2005. |
|
300 |
_axi, 219 pages ; _c24 cm. |
||
336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
337 |
_aunmediated _bn _2rdamedia |
||
338 |
_avolume _bnc _2rdacarrier |
||
490 | 1 |
_aCass series on peacekeeping ; _v17 |
|
504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references and index. | ||
505 | 0 | 0 |
_tIntroduction / _rPia Christina Wood and David S. Sorenson -- _g1. _tAustralia / _rHugh Smith -- _g2. _tGermany / _rMary N. Hampton -- _g3. _tArgentina / _rCynthia A. Watson -- _g4. _tFrance / _rPia Christina Wood -- _g5. _tThe United Kingdom / _rTom Woodhouse and Alexander Ramsbotham -- _g6. _tThe United States / _rDavid S. Sorenson -- _g7. _tAustria / _rErwin A. Schmidl -- _g8. _tCanada / _rDavid Rudd -- _g9. _tNigeria / _rHerbert M. Howe -- _g10. _tIndia / _rAlan James Bullion. |
520 | _a"Much of the scholarly literature on peacekeeping focuses on particular peacekeeping operations, or on the political bargaining between peacekeeping participants at both the institutional and national levels. However, there is very little published research on why nations commit forces to peacekeeping operations. As Sandra Whitworth noted in a book review of six books on peacekeeping in the International Journal, "the important political questions thus far have not been asked: who benefits, who pays, and who is excluded?". This book addresses that need.The authors focus specifically on the political and economic motivations that influence the decision to participate in peacekeeping. They consider how definitions of national interest frame the political debate, and what the reasons are for the military support or opposition for peacekeeping operations. They also explore the role of inter-agency politics, the role of public opinion in peacekeeping decisions, and the influence of pressure; from other nations and non-nation actors to commit peacekeeping forces. Each chapter includes several recent cases of national peacekeeping to illustrate how national political debates framed their country's political decisions on the commitment of peacekeeping forces. The countries chosen for analysis are Australia, Argentina, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, the United States, Nigeria, Canada, India, and Austria."--Publisher description. | ||
588 | _aMachine converted from AACR2 source record. | ||
650 | 0 |
_aPeacekeeping forces _9329032 |
|
650 | 0 |
_aPolitical planning _9322523 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aSorenson, David S., _d1943- _eeditor. _9424081 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aWood, Pia Christina, _eeditor. _91055155 |
|
830 | 0 |
_aCass series on peacekeeping ; _v17. _91029020 |
|
907 |
_a.b11040658 _b25-06-19 _c27-10-15 |
||
942 | _cB | ||
945 |
_a341.584 POL _g1 _iA293844B _j0 _lcmain _o- _p$176.17 _q- _r- _s- _t0 _u2 _v0 _w0 _x0 _y.i1229763x _z29-10-15 |
||
998 |
_a(3)b _a(3)c _b20-03-18 _cm _da _feng _genk _h4 |
||
999 |
_c1161782 _d1161782 |