000 | 03948cam a2200481 i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
005 | 20221109165215.0 | ||
008 | 030317s2004 nyu b 001 0 eng d | ||
010 | _a 2003046181 | ||
011 | _aMARC Score : 11200(25450) : OK | ||
011 | _aDirect Search Result | ||
011 | _aBIB MATCHES WORLDCAT | ||
020 | _a0521830753 | ||
020 | _a9780521830751 | ||
020 |
_a052153772X _qpbk. |
||
020 |
_a9780521537728 _qpbk. |
||
035 | _a(ATU)b1098382x | ||
035 | _a(OCoLC)51931118 | ||
040 |
_aDLC _beng _erda _cDLC _dBAKER _dNLGGC _dUBA _dBTCTA _dLVB _dYDXCP _dI8H _dGEBAY _dOCLCQ _dUKMGB _dA7U _dOCLCO _dATU |
||
050 | 0 | 0 |
_aP301.5.P47 _bG76 2004 |
082 | 0 | 0 |
_a808 _221 |
100 | 1 |
_aEemeren, F. H. van _q(Frans Hendrik), _d1946- _eauthor. _9278238 |
|
245 | 1 | 2 |
_aA systematic theory of argumentation : _bthe pragma-dialectical approach / _cFrans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst. |
264 | 1 |
_aNew York : _bCambridge University Press, _c2004. |
|
300 |
_avii, 216 pages ; _c24 cm |
||
336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
337 |
_aunmediated _bn _2rdamedia |
||
338 |
_avolume _bnc _2rdacarrier |
||
504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references and index. | ||
505 | 0 | _a1. Introduction -- 2. The realm of argumentation studies -- 3. A model of a critical discussion -- 4. Relevance -- 5. Analysis as reconstruction -- 6. Rules for a critical discussion -- 7. Fallacies -- -- | |
505 | 0 | 0 |
_g1. _tIntroduction -- _g2. _tThe realm of argumentation studies -- _g3. _tA model of a critical discussion -- _g4. _tRelevance -- _g5. _tAnalysis as reconstruction -- _g6. _tRules for a critical discussion -- _g7. _tFallacies -- _g8. _tA code of conduct for reasonable discussants. |
520 | 1 | _a"In A Systematic Theory of Argumentation, two of the leading figures in argumentation theory, Frans H. van Eemeren and Rob Grootendorst, present a view of argumentation as a means of resolving differences of opinion by testing the acceptability of the disputed positions. Their model of a "critical discussion" serves as a theoretical tool for analyzing, evaluating, and producing argumentative discourse. In this approach, pragmatic and dialectical insights are combined by conceiving a critical discussion as a methodological exchange of speech acts between two parties." "A Systematic Theory of Argumentation is a major contribution to the study of argumentation and will be of particular value to professionals and graduate students in speech communication, informal logic, rhetoric, critical thinking, linguistics, and philosophy."--Jacket. | |
520 | 1 | _a"In A Systematic Theory of Argumentation, two of the leading figures in argumentation theory, Frans H. van Eemeren and Rob Grootendorst, present a view of argumentation as a means of resolving differences of opinion by testing the acceptability of the disputed positions. Their model of a "critical discussion" serves as a theoretical tool for analyzing, evaluating, and producing argumentative discourse. In this approach, pragmatic and dialectical insights are combined by conceiving a critical discussion as a methodological exchange of speech acts between two parties." "A Systematic Theory of Argumentation is a major contribution to the study of argumentation and will be of particular value to professionals and graduate students in speech communication, informal logic, rhetoric, critical thinking, linguistics, and philosophy."--BOOK JACKET. | |
588 | _aMachine converted from AACR2 source record. | ||
650 | 0 |
_aPersuasion (Rhetoric) _9322126 |
|
650 | 0 |
_aPragmatics _9322653 |
|
650 | 0 |
_aDialectic _9316651 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aGrootendorst, R. _q(Robert), _d1944-2000 _eauthor. _9278237 |
|
856 | 4 | 1 |
_3Sample text _uhttp://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/samples/cam041/2003046181.html |
907 |
_a.b1098382x _b11-09-21 _c27-10-15 |
||
998 |
_a(4)b _a(4)c _b23-03-18 _cm _da _feng _gnyu _h2 |
||
945 |
_a808 EEM _g1 _iA292425B _j0 _lcmain _o- _p$97.27 _q- _r- _s- _t0 _u9 _v0 _w0 _x1 _y.i12220231 _z29-10-15 |
||
942 | _cB | ||
999 |
_c1157623 _d1157623 |