000 03948cam a2200481 i 4500
005 20221109165215.0
008 030317s2004 nyu b 001 0 eng d
010 _a 2003046181
011 _aMARC Score : 11200(25450) : OK
011 _aDirect Search Result
011 _aBIB MATCHES WORLDCAT
020 _a0521830753
020 _a9780521830751
020 _a052153772X
_qpbk.
020 _a9780521537728
_qpbk.
035 _a(ATU)b1098382x
035 _a(OCoLC)51931118
040 _aDLC
_beng
_erda
_cDLC
_dBAKER
_dNLGGC
_dUBA
_dBTCTA
_dLVB
_dYDXCP
_dI8H
_dGEBAY
_dOCLCQ
_dUKMGB
_dA7U
_dOCLCO
_dATU
050 0 0 _aP301.5.P47
_bG76 2004
082 0 0 _a808
_221
100 1 _aEemeren, F. H. van
_q(Frans Hendrik),
_d1946-
_eauthor.
_9278238
245 1 2 _aA systematic theory of argumentation :
_bthe pragma-dialectical approach /
_cFrans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst.
264 1 _aNew York :
_bCambridge University Press,
_c2004.
300 _avii, 216 pages ;
_c24 cm
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _aunmediated
_bn
_2rdamedia
338 _avolume
_bnc
_2rdacarrier
504 _aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505 0 _a1. Introduction -- 2. The realm of argumentation studies -- 3. A model of a critical discussion -- 4. Relevance -- 5. Analysis as reconstruction -- 6. Rules for a critical discussion -- 7. Fallacies -- --
505 0 0 _g1.
_tIntroduction --
_g2.
_tThe realm of argumentation studies --
_g3.
_tA model of a critical discussion --
_g4.
_tRelevance --
_g5.
_tAnalysis as reconstruction --
_g6.
_tRules for a critical discussion --
_g7.
_tFallacies --
_g8.
_tA code of conduct for reasonable discussants.
520 1 _a"In A Systematic Theory of Argumentation, two of the leading figures in argumentation theory, Frans H. van Eemeren and Rob Grootendorst, present a view of argumentation as a means of resolving differences of opinion by testing the acceptability of the disputed positions. Their model of a "critical discussion" serves as a theoretical tool for analyzing, evaluating, and producing argumentative discourse. In this approach, pragmatic and dialectical insights are combined by conceiving a critical discussion as a methodological exchange of speech acts between two parties." "A Systematic Theory of Argumentation is a major contribution to the study of argumentation and will be of particular value to professionals and graduate students in speech communication, informal logic, rhetoric, critical thinking, linguistics, and philosophy."--Jacket.
520 1 _a"In A Systematic Theory of Argumentation, two of the leading figures in argumentation theory, Frans H. van Eemeren and Rob Grootendorst, present a view of argumentation as a means of resolving differences of opinion by testing the acceptability of the disputed positions. Their model of a "critical discussion" serves as a theoretical tool for analyzing, evaluating, and producing argumentative discourse. In this approach, pragmatic and dialectical insights are combined by conceiving a critical discussion as a methodological exchange of speech acts between two parties." "A Systematic Theory of Argumentation is a major contribution to the study of argumentation and will be of particular value to professionals and graduate students in speech communication, informal logic, rhetoric, critical thinking, linguistics, and philosophy."--BOOK JACKET.
588 _aMachine converted from AACR2 source record.
650 0 _aPersuasion (Rhetoric)
_9322126
650 0 _aPragmatics
_9322653
650 0 _aDialectic
_9316651
700 1 _aGrootendorst, R.
_q(Robert),
_d1944-2000
_eauthor.
_9278237
856 4 1 _3Sample text
_uhttp://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/samples/cam041/2003046181.html
907 _a.b1098382x
_b11-09-21
_c27-10-15
998 _a(4)b
_a(4)c
_b23-03-18
_cm
_da
_feng
_gnyu
_h2
945 _a808 EEM
_g1
_iA292425B
_j0
_lcmain
_o-
_p$97.27
_q-
_r-
_s-
_t0
_u9
_v0
_w0
_x1
_y.i12220231
_z29-10-15
942 _cB
999 _c1157623
_d1157623