000			15923cam a2200469 i 4500
005			20221110064026.0
008			050509s2005 inu b s000 0 eng d
010			_a 2004022162
011			_aBIB MATCHES WORLDCAT
020			_a0253345707 _qcloth (alk. paper)
020			_a9780253345707 _qcloth (alk. paper)
035			_a(ATU)b10981822
035			_a(OCoLC)56614162
040			_aDLC _beng _erda _cDLC _dUKM _dC#P _dBAKER _dBTCTA _dLVB _dYDXCP _dOCLCG _dOCLCQ _dATU
041	1		_aeng _hger
042			_apcc
050	0	0	_aB3279.H48 _bE3613 2005
082	0	0	_a142.7 _222
100	1		_aHeidegger, Martin, _d1889-1976 _eauthor. _9355381
240	1	0	_aEinführung in die phänomenologische Forschung. _lEnglish
245	1	0	_aIntroduction to phenomenological research / _cMartin Heidegger ; translated by Daniel O. Dahlstrom.
264		1	_aBloomington : _bIndiana University Press, _c[2005]
264		4	_c©2005
300			_axiv, 252 pages ; _c25 cm.
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_aunmediated _bn _2rdamedia
338			_avolume _bnc _2rdacarrier
490	1		_aStudies in Continental thought
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references.
505	0	0	_tTranslator's Foreword -- _tPreliminary Remark -- _gPart 1. _t[Phi]Ainomenon and [characters not reproducible] in Aristotle and Husserl's Self-Interpretation of Phenomenology -- _gChapter 1. _tElucidation of the expression "phenomenology" by going back to Aristotle -- _g1. _tClarification of [characters not reproducible] on the basis of the Aristotelian analysis of perceiving the world by way of seeing -- _ga). _t[characters not reproducible] as a distinctive manner of an entity's presence: existence during the day -- _gb). _t[characters not reproducible] as anything that of itself shows itself in daylight or darkness -- _g2. _tThe Aristotelian determination of [characters not reproducible] -- _ga). _tTalk ([characters not reproducible]) as a voice that means something ([characters not reproducible]); [characters not reproducible] and [characters not reproducible] -- _gb). _tThe ostensive talk ([characters not reproducible]) that reveals ([characters not reproducible]) or conceals ([characters not reproducible]) the existing world in affirming ([characters not reproducible]) and denying ([characters not reproducible]); the [characters not reproducible] -- _gc). _tThe possibility of deception, the [characters not reproducible] and the [characters not reproducible] -- _gd). _tThe three aspects of [characters not reproducible]. The factical existence of speaking as an authentic source of deception. Circumstantiality and elusiveness of the world -- _ge). _tSpeaking and the world in its possibilities of deception. The shift of the meaning of [characters not reproducible] into illusion -- _gf). _t[characters not reproducible] and [characters not reproducible] as the realm of the possibilities of the true and the false -- _gChapter 2. _tPresent-day phenomenology in Husseri's self-interpretation -- _g3. _tRecapitulation of the facts of the matter gathered from the interpretation of Aristotle. Anticipation of the predominance of care about the idea of certainty and evidence over freeing up possibilities of encountering fundamental facts of the matter -- _g4. _tConsciousness as the theme of present-day phenomenology -- _ga). _tGreek philosophy without a concept of consciousness -- _gb). _tPhenomenology's breakthrough in Husserl's Logical Investigations and their basic tendency -- _gc). _tThe orientation of Greek philosophy and the question of its reversal -- _g5. _tThe theme of "consciousness" in the Logical Investigations -- _ga). _tThe Logical Investigations between a traditional orientation and primordial questioning -- _gb). _tIdeal meaning and acts of meaning; emptily meaning something and meaning-fulfillment; consciousness as the region of experiences; intentional experiences as acts; consciousness as inner perception -- _g6. _tThe care about already known knowledge, in which consciousness stands -- _ga). _tCare and its possibilities of disclosing, holding onto, and shaping what it takes care of; its commitment to and loss of itself in what it takes care of -- _gb). _tCare about already known knowledge -- _g7. _tHusserl's polemic with contemporary philosophy in the essay "Philosophy as Rigorous Science" and the care about already known knowledge at work in it. The general aim of this essay -- _g8. _tHusserl's critique of naturalism -- _ga). _tNaturalization of consciousness -- _gb). _tNaturalization of ideas -- _gc). _tNature's being as experimental psychology's horizon -- _gd). _tThe peculiar being of consciousness as the true object of philosophy and the method of discerning essences to acquire universally binding sentences -- _g9. _tClarification of the problems as purification and radicalization of their bias. The care about securing and justifying an absolute scientific status -- _g10. _tClarification of problems -- _ga). _tThe question and its structures -- _gb). _tThe problem and the factors of its being: clarifying the problem as a matter of co-deciding on what is to be interrogated, what it is asked, the regard in question, and the tendency of the answer -- _gc). _tHusserl's clarification of the tendency of the problem of naturalism through transcendental and eidetic purification of consciousness. Absolute validity and evidence --
505	0	0	_g11. _tOrder of the inquiry and clue to the explication of the structure of all experiential connections -- _ga). _tOrientation toward connections among disciplines: philosophy as a science of norms and values -- _gb). _tTheoretical knowing as the clue -- _g12. _tCharacteristic factors of care about already known knowledge in Husserl's critique of naturalism: back-flash, falling-prey, pre-constructing, ensnarement, neglect -- _g13. _tHusserl's critique of historicism -- _ga). _tThe different basis of this critique -- _gb). _tThe neglect of human existence, in the deficient care, care about absolute, normative lawfulness -- _g14. _tCritique of historicism on the path of the clarification of problems -- _ga). _tHusserl's critique of Dilthey -- _gb). _tHistorical existence as the object of neglect -- _gc). _tOrigin and legitimacy of the contrast between matter of factness and validity -- _gd). _tThe reproach of skepticism and the care revealing itself therein, care about already known knowledge as anxiety in the face of existence -- _ge). _tThe preconceptions about existence at work in this care -- _g15. _tMaking more precise what care about already known knowledge is -- _ga). _tCare about justified knowledge, about a universally binding character that is evident -- _gb). _t"To the matters themselves": care about matters prefigured by a universally binding character -- _gc). _tCare about the rigor of science as derivative seriousness; the mathematical idea of rigor, uncritically set up as an absolute norm -- _g16. _tDisclosing the thematic field of "consciousness" through the care about already known knowledge. Return to the historical, concrete instance of the care -- _ga). _tCare's circumspection and aim -- _gb). _tDescartes' research as a factically-historical, concrete instance of the care in its disclosing of the thematic field of "consciousness" -- _gPart 2. _tReturn to Descartes and The Scholastic Ontology That Determines Him -- _gChapter 1. _tMaking sense of the return to Descartes by recalling what has been elaborated up to this point -- _g17. _tThe hermeneutic situation of the investigations up to this point and of those standing before us -- _g18. _tBecoming free from the discipline and traditional possibilities as a way of becoming free for existence. Investigation as destruction in the ontological investigation of existence -- _g19. _tReturn to the genuine being of care about already known knowledge in its primordial past as a return to Descartes -- _g20. _tDestruction as the path of the interpretation of existence. Three tasks for the explication of how, in its being, care about already known knowledge is disclosive. The question of the sense of the truth of knowledge in Descartes -- _gChapter 2. _tDescartes. The how and the what of the being-qua-disclosing of care about knowledge already known -- _g21. _tDeterminations of "truth" -- _g22. _tThree possibilities of care about already known knowledge: curiosity, certitude, being binding -- _gChapter 3. _tDescartes' determination of falsum and verum -- _g23. _tPreview of the context of the question -- _g24. _tThe cogito sum, the clara et distincta perceptio, and the task of securing, in keeping with being, the criterion of truth -- _g25. _tDescartes' classification of the variety of cogitationes. The judicium as the place for the verum and falsum -- _g26. _tThe distinction between the idea as repraesentans aliquid and its repraesentatum; realitas objectiva and realitas formalis sive actualis [the distinction between the idea as representing something and what it represents; objective reality and formal or actual reality] -- _g27. _tThe question of the being of the falsum and error -- _ga). _tThe constitution of error: intellectus and voluntas as libertas; Descartes' two concepts of freedom -- _gb). _tThe concursus of intellectus and voluntas [the concurrence of the intellect and the will] as the being of error. Theological problems as the foundation of both concepts of freedom -- _g28. _tThe sense of being of error: error as res and as privatio, as detrimental to the genuine being of the created human being (creatum esse). Perceptum esse and creatum esse as basic determinations of the esse of the res cogitans -- _gChapter 4. _tGoing back to Scholastic ontology: the verum esse in Thomas Aquinas -- _g29. _tThe connection of the verum and the ens: being-true as a mode of being (De veritate, q. 1, art. 1) --
505	0	0	_g30. _tThe genuine being of the verum as convenientia in intellectus (De veritate, q. 1, art. 1-3) -- _g31. _tIn what sense the verum is in the intellectus (De veritate, q. 1, art. 9) -- _g32. _tThe grounding of verum's genuine being in the primordial truth of God (De veritate, q. 1, art. 4 and 8) -- _g33. _tThe ways of being able to determine God's being from the perspective of Aristotelian ontology (Summa theologica, vol. 1, q. 2-3) -- _gChapter 5. _tThe care of knowledge in Descartes -- _g34. _tDescartes' determination of knowing's manner of being as judging, against the horizon of being as creatum esse -- _g35. _tThe regimentation of judging: clara et distincta perceptio as a universal rule of knowing -- _g36. _tThe origin of clarity and distinctness. Descartes' idea of science and the rules for the direction of the mind -- _g37. _tThe care of knowing as care about certainty, as mistaking oneself -- _g38. _tThe care that tranquilizes. Descartes' interpretation of the verum as certum while retaining Scholastic ontology -- _gChapter 6. _tThe character of being of the res cogitans, of consciousness -- _g39. _tThe certum aliquid as what is sought by the care of knowing -- _g40. _tThe caring search as dubitare, remotio and suppositio falsi -- _g41. _tThe path of the caring dubitatio in the First Meditation subject to the regula generalis: the being of the searcher (ego sum) as the first thing found -- _g42. _tThe caring search in the Second Meditation for what the ego sum is under the guidance of the regula generalis: the ego cogito -- _g43. _tWhat is found by the care about certainty: a valid, universally binding proposition -- _gPart 3. _tDemonstrating the Neglect of the Question of Being As a Way of Pointing to Existence -- _gChapter 1. _tMisplacing the question of the res cogitans' specific being through care about certainty -- _g44. _tDescartes' perversion of "having-oneself-with" into a formally-ontological proposition -- _g45. _tSummary characterization of the res cogitans found by Descartes: misplacing the possibility of access to the res cogitans' genuine being -- _gChapter 2. _tDescartes' inquiry into res cogitans' being-certain and the lack of specification of the character of being of consciousness as the thematic field of Husserl's phenomenology -- _g46. _tDescartes and Husserl: fundamental differences -- _ga). _tDescartes' way of doubt (remotio) and Husserl's reduction -- _gb). _tDescartes' cogito and Husserl's consciousness -- _gc). _tThe absolutum of Descartes' res cogitans and the absoluteness of Husserl's pure consciousness -- _gd). _tDescartes' res cogitans as ens creatum and Husserl's pure consciousness as ens regionale -- _ge). _tThe connection that ultimately motivates Descartes' research and the tendencies that are ultimately decisive for Husserl's phenomenology -- _g47. _tHusserl and Descartes: connection and uniform basic tendency in the care about certainty -- _ga). _tUndiscussed appropriation of the cogito sum -- _gb). _tExplicitly laying claim to the certitudo for the absolute region of being -- _gc). _tThe uprooting that occurs in taking over the cogito sum as the certum for the process of setting up consciousness' absolute self-evidence as the nucleus -- _gd). _tCare about certainty as care about the formation of science -- _gChapter 3. _tHusserl's more primordial neglect of the question of being, opposite the thematic field of phenomenology, and the task of seeing and explicating existence in its being -- _g48. _tHusserl's mangling of phenomenological finds through the care, derived from Descartes, about certainty -- _ga). _tIntentionality as specific, theoretical behavior -- _gb). _tEvidence as theoretical knowing's evidence in grasping and determining -- _gc). _tEidetic reduction of pure consciousness under the guidance of ontological determinations alien to consciousness -- _g49. _tInvestigation of the history of the origin of the categories as a presupposition for seeing and determining existence -- _g50. _tRetrieval of the characteristics of the care of knowing that have been run through and pointing to existence itself in terms of some fundamental determinations -- _ga). _tThree groups of characters of care about already known knowledge and their determination as a unity -- _g[alpha]). _tOverstepping oneself, mistaking-oneself, tranquilizing, and masking as remoteness from being -- _g[beta]). _tMisplacing, rise of needlessness, and falling prey as the absence of existence's temporality -- _g[gamma]). _tObstructing and diverting as leveling being -- _gb). _tFlight of existence in the face of itself and the uncoveredness of its being-in-a-world, burying any possibility of encountering it, distorting as a basic movement of existence -- _gc). _tFacticity, threat, eeriness, everydayness -- _gAppendix. _tSupplements to the lectures from the lecture notes of Helene Weiss and Herbert Marcuse -- _tSupplement 1 (to p. 4) -- _tSupplement 2 (to p. 6) -- _tSupplement 3 (to p. 21) -- _tSupplement 4 (to p. 22) -- _tSupplement 5 (to p. 30) -- _tSupplement 6 (to p. 36) -- _tSupplement 7 (to p. 41) -- _tSupplement 8 (to p. 52) -- _tSupplement 9 (to p. 65) -- _tSupplement 10 (to p. 69) -- _tSupplement 11 (to p. 69) -- _tSupplement 12 (to p. 74) -- _tSupplement 13 (to p. 74) -- _tSupplement 14 (to p. 77) -- _tSupplement 15 (to p. 79) -- _tSupplement 16 (to p. 93) -- _tSupplement 17 (to p. 98) -- _tSupplement 18 (to p. 106) -- _tSupplement 19 (to p. 107) -- _tSupplement 20 (to p. 112) -- _tSupplement 21 (to p. 116) -- _tSupplement 22 (to p. 123) -- _tSupplement 23 (to p. 152) -- _tSupplement 24 (to p. 160) -- _tSupplement 25 (to p. 189) -- _tSupplement 26 (to p. 197) -- _tSupplement 27 (to p. 207) -- _tSupplement 28 (to p. 208) -- _tSupplement 29 (to p. 210) -- _tSupplement 30 (to p. 221) -- _tEditor's Afterword.
546			_aTranslated from the German.
588			_aMachine converted from AACR2 source record.
650		0	_aPhenomenology _9322172
700	1		_aDahlstrom, Daniel O., _etranslator. _91052973
830		0	_aStudies in Continental thought. _91021762
907			_a.b10981822 _b31-07-21 _c27-10-15
942			_cB
945			_a142.7 HEI _g1 _iA266728B _j0 _lnmain _o- _p$53.08 _q- _r- _s- _t0 _u39 _v29 _w3 _x7 _y.i12260915 _z29-10-15
998			_ab _an _b11-05-18 _cm _da _feng _ginu _h0
999			_c1157485 _d1157485