000 | 03965cam a22003858a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
005 | 20221109171511.0 | ||
008 | 010220s2001 nyu b 001 0 eng | ||
010 | _a 2001019349 | ||
011 | _aBIB MATCHES WORLDCAT | ||
020 | _a0415257166 | ||
020 | _a0415257174 | ||
035 | _a(ATU)b10800487 | ||
035 | _a(DLC) 2001019349 | ||
035 | _a(OCoLC)317802014 | ||
040 | _aDLC | ||
042 | _apcc | ||
050 | 0 | 0 |
_aHB97 _b.H63 2001 |
082 | 0 | 0 |
_a330.15/42 _221 |
100 | 1 |
_aHodgson, Geoffrey Martin, _d1946- _9234381 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aHow economics forgot history : _bthe problem of historical specificity in social science / _cGeoffrey M. Hodgson. |
263 | _a0109 | ||
264 | 1 |
_aNew York : _bRoutledge, _c2001. |
|
300 | _ap. cm. | ||
490 | 1 | _aEconomics as social theory | |
504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references and index. | ||
505 | 0 | 0 |
_gPt. I. _tIntroduction. _g1. _tThe limitations of general theory. _g2. _tThe problem of historical specificity -- _gPt. II. _tThe nineteenth century: the German historical school and its impact. _g3. _tKarl Marx and the specificity of the capitalist system. _g4. _tThe older historical school in Germany. _g5. _tThe historical school in the British Isles. _g6. _tThe methodological failure of the older historical school. _g7. _tOut of Austria: Carl Menger and the Methodenstreit. _g8. _tAlfred Marshall and the British Methodendiskurs. _g9. _tThe responses of the younger historical school in Germany -- _gPt. III. _tThe twentieth century: from American institutionalism to the end of history. _g10. _tThorstein Veblen and the foundations of Institutionalism. _g11. _tEarly American institutionalism and the problem of historical specificity. _g12. _tThe theoretical manifesto of John Commons. _g13. _tTalcott Parsons and the ascent of ahistorical sociology. _g14. _tDeath and counter-revolution at the London School of Economics. _g15. _tJohn Maynard Keynes and his declaration of a General Theory. _g16. _tThe triumph of barren universality. _g17. _tInstitution blindness and the end of history -- _gPt. IV. _tThe millennium: the second coming of history? _g18. _tAre there universals in social and economic theory? _g19. _tProperty, culture, habits and institutions. _g20. _tExchange and production: property and firms. _g21. _tA note on social formations and levels of abstraction. _g22. _tAn evolutionary perspective on the historical problem. _g23. _tInvention is helpless without tradition. |
520 | 1 | _a"Economics today has been widely criticised as being more concerned with mathematical technique than the understanding and explanation of real world phenomena. However, one hundred years ago, in Europe and America, economics was fused with the study of history and its practitioners emphasised the importance of the understanding of specific institutions." "How Economics Forgot History shows how the German historical school addressed a key problem in social science and concerned themselves with the historical specific character of economic phenomena and the need to make economic theory more sensitive to the historical and geographical variety of different socio-economic systems. Examining the nature and evolution of the problem of historical specificity, it shows how this issue was tackled by Karl Marx, Gustav Schmoller, Carl Menger, Werner Sombart, Max Weber, Alfred Marshall, John Rogers Commons and Frank Knight. It is also argued that alongside Lionel Robbins, leading figures such as John Maynard Keynes, Joseph Schumpeter and Talcott Parsons also helped to divert the social sciences away from this problem."--BOOK JACKET. | |
650 | 0 |
_aHistorical school of economics _9318826 |
|
650 | 0 |
_aSocial sciences _xStudy and teaching _9371327 |
|
830 | 0 |
_aEconomics as social theory. _91029608 |
|
907 |
_a.b10800487 _b03-10-17 _c27-10-15 |
||
942 | _cB | ||
945 |
_a330.1542 HOD _g1 _iA296462B _j0 _lcmain _o- _p$49.55 _q- _r- _s- _t0 _u15 _v22 _w1 _x1 _y.i11939825 _z29-10-15 |
||
998 |
_a(2)b _a(2)c _b06-04-16 _cm _da _feng _gnyu _h0 |
||
999 |
_c1144228 _d1144228 |