000 | 03437pam a22004454i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
005 | 20221101183011.0 | ||
008 | 021211s2003 njua bu 001 0 eng d | ||
010 | _a 2002042999 | ||
011 | _aBIB MATCHES WORLDCAT | ||
020 |
_a0765801787 _qcloth (alk. paper) |
||
020 |
_a9780765801784 _qcloth (alk. paper) |
||
035 | _a(ATU)b10785711 | ||
035 | _a(DLC) 2002042999 | ||
035 | _a(OCoLC)51251695 | ||
040 |
_aDLC _beng _erda _dATU |
||
042 | _apcc | ||
043 | _an-us--- | ||
050 | 0 | 0 |
_aLB3051 _b.P54 2003 |
082 | 0 | 0 |
_a371.262 _221 |
100 | 1 |
_aPhelps, Richard P., _eauthor. _91045652 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aKill the messenger : _bthe war on standardized testing / _cRichard P. Phelps ; with a foreword by Herbert J. Walberg and a preface by J.E. Stone. |
246 | 3 |
_aKill the messenger : _bThe war on standardised testing |
|
264 | 1 |
_aNew Brunswick, N.J. : _bTransaction Publishers, _c[2003] |
|
264 | 4 | _c©2003 | |
300 |
_axix, 331 pages : _billustrations ; _c23 cm |
||
336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
337 |
_aunmediated _bn _2rdamedia |
||
338 |
_avolume _bnc _2rdacarrier |
||
504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 301-319) and index. | ||
505 | 0 | 0 |
_tReveille - Prelude to Battle (Introduction) -- _g1. _tThe Battlefield (Testing Systems and Testing Interests) -- _g2. _tAttack Strategies and Tactics -- _g3. _tCampaigns: The Big, Bad SAT -- _g4. _tCampaigns: Texas, the Early Years -- _g5. _tCampaigns: Texas, the Presidential Election Year 2000 -- _g6. _tWar Correspondence (Media Coverage of Testing) -- _g7. _tThe Fruits of Victory (Benefits of Testing) -- _g8. _tThe Spoils of War (Valid Concerns about Testing) -- _g9. _tThe Agony of Defeat (The Consequences of Losing the War: The Alternatives to Standardized Testing) -- _gApp. _tAn Anti-Testing Vocabulary. |
520 | 1 | _a"Kill the Messenger is perhaps the most thorough and authoritative work in defense of educational testing ever written. Phelps points out that much research conducted by education insiders on the topic is based on ideological preference or profound self-interest. It is not surprising that they arrive at emphatically anti-testing conclusions. He notes that "external" and "high stakes" testing in particular attracts a cornucopia of invective. Much, if not most, of this hostile research is passed on to the public by journalists as if it were neutral, objective, and independent." "Kill the Messenger describes the current debate, the players, their interests, and their positions. It explains and refutes many of the common criticisms of testing. It describes testing opponents' strategies, through case studies of Texas and the SAT. It illustrates the profound media bias against testing. It acknowledges testing's limitations, and suggests how it can be improved. It defends testing by comparing it with its alternatives. And finally, it outlines the consequences for America of losing the "war on standardized testing.""--BOOK JACKET. | |
588 | _aMachine converted from AACR2 source record. | ||
650 | 0 |
_aEducational tests and measurements _zUnited States _9371412 |
|
650 | 0 |
_aEducation _xStandards _zUnited States _9590536 |
|
650 | 0 |
_aEducational accountability _zUnited States _9375155 |
|
907 |
_a.b10785711 _b28-05-18 _c27-10-15 |
||
942 | _cB | ||
945 |
_a371.262 PHE _g1 _iA258883B _j0 _lcmain _o- _p$60.00 _q- _r- _s- _t0 _u3 _v0 _w0 _x2 _y.i11924470 _z29-10-15 |
||
998 |
_a(2)b _a(2)c _b06-04-16 _cm _da _feng _gnju _h0 |
||
999 |
_c1143163 _d1143163 |