TY  - BOOK
AU  - Stokke,Olav Schram
AU  - Vidas,Davor
TI  - Governing the Antarctic: the effectiveness and legitimacy of the Antarctic Treaty system 
SN  - 0521572371
AV  - KWX70 .G69 1996
U1  - 341.29 23
PY  - 1996///
CY  - Cambridge [England], New York
PB  - Cambridge University Press
KW  - Antarctic Treaty system
KW  - Antarctica
KW  - International status
N1  - Includes bibliographical references and index; Introduction / Olav Schram Stokke and Davor Vidas -- 1. Effectiveness and legitimacy of international regimes / Olav Schram Stokke and Davor Vidas -- 2. The Antarctic Treaty System in the international community: an overview / Davor Vidas -- 3. The Antarctic Treaty System and the law of the sea: a new dimension introduced by the Protocol / Davor Vidas -- 4. The changing roles of non-governmental organisations in the Antarctic Treaty System / Richard A. Herr -- 5. The effectiveness of CCAMLR / Olav Schram Stokke -- 6. The effectiveness of CRAMRA / Christopher C. Joyner -- 7. The effectiveness of the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty / Francisco Orrego Vicuna -- 8. The regulation of Antarctic tourism: a study in regime effectiveness / Richard A. Herr -- The legitimacy of ATS regimes: introduction / Davor Vidas and Willy Ostreng -- 9. The legitimacy of CCAMLR / Bruce W. Davis -- 10. The legitimacy of CRAMRA / Christopher C. Joyner
N2  - After thirty-five years, the regime based on the Antarctic Treaty is more vigorous than ever. Here leading scholars of international law and international relations examine the effectiveness and legitimacy of this regime by asking two questions: are current changes affecting the ability of this regime to cope with major problems in the region, and how do those changes affect its standing among parties to the Treaty and in the wider international community? Individual chapters deal with Antarctic regimes for marine living resources, mineral activities, environmental protection and tourism. Throughout, a keen eye is kept on how these components interact and reinforce each other. This analysis is supported by in-depth studies of compatibility and tension between the Antarctic Treaty System and the international community at large. It also draws upon case studies of how domestic concerns and decision-making in four selected countries affect international cooperation in the Antarctic
ER  -