Motiti : report on the Te Moutere o Motiti Inquiry : WAI 2521.
Material type: TextSeries: New Zealand. Waitangi Tribunal reports ; Publisher: Lower Hutt, New Zealand : Legislation Direct, 2023Description: xx, 237 pages : illustrations (some colour) ; 23 cmContent type:- text
- unmediated
- volume
- 1869563565
- 9781869563561
- WAI 2521
- Report on the Te Moutere o Motiti Inquiry : WAI 2521
- 348.93041 23
- KUQ716.7.A15 W144 no.2521
Item type | Current library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Book | City Campus City Campus Main Collection | 348.93041 NEW (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | A562633B | ||
Book | South Campus South Campus Main Collection | 348.93041 NEW (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | A562632B |
Includes bibliographical references.
"This report was previously released online in pre-publication format in 2022 as Motiti: Report on the Te Moutere o Motiti Inquiry - Pre-publication version"--Title page verso.
Chapter 1. Kupu whakataki, Introduction -- Chapter 2. Te ture me te Tiriti, The Treaty context -- Chapter 3. Ko wai te tangata whenua o Motiti? Who are the tangata whenua of Motiti Island? -- Chapter 4. Te pānga o ngā kereeme whakapapa mai i a Te Hapū, Did the Ngāti Awa Claims Settlement Act 2005 settle Motiti Island claims based on whakapapa from Te Hapū? -- Chapter 5. Te tirohanga o te whakapapa, Through it's kinship review, has the Crown properly informed itself of the identity of the tangata whenua of Motiti Island? -- Chapter 6. He whakawhitiwhitinga whakaaro, Suggestions.
"Motiti: report on the Te Moutere o Motiti inquiry is the result of a Waitangi Tribunal inquiry focusing on a 'kinship review' undertaken by the Crown in 2015 and 2016. This review sought to assess the claimants' argument that the tangata whenua of Motiti Island are a distinct tribal group, separate from Ngāti Awa, and that their historical Treaty of Waitangi claims remain unsettled. The review also aimed to clarify who the Crown should engage with in relation to Motiti by identifying which tribal group or groups had authority to speak for the island. Motiti examines the claimants' allegations that the review was flawed and that it reached incorrect findings, perpetuating what they saw as the Crown's enduring failure to understand their identity and to recognise their distinct rights on Motiti. It also considers whether the Ngāti Awa Claims Settlement Act 2005 settled Motiti Island historical claims based on descent from Te Hapū"--Publisher information.
There are no comments on this title.