Criminal advocacy and defective representation / by Robert S. Shiels.
Material type: TextPublisher: Edinburgh : W. Green, 2013Copyright date: ©2013 Description: xix, 201 pages ; 22 cmContent type:- text
- unmediated
- volume
- 9780414018983 (paperback)
- 0414018982 (paperback)
- 347.052 23
Contents:
Content advice: Robert Shiels takes on the task of reinforcing the principles of the case of Anderson v HM Advocate in 1996, prior to which there were no grounds for appeal due to defective respresentation.
Introduction -- Anderson v HM Advocate -- Discussion and issues -- Reassessing the Anderson principle -- Grant v HM Advocate -- Assistance from counsel or solicitors -- England and Wales -- Comparative cases from other jurisdictions -- Conclusion -- App.1. Guide to the professional conduct of advocates -- App.2. The Law Society of Scotland Practice Rules 2011, rule C4: solicitor advocates.
Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Book | City Campus City Campus Main Collection | 347.052 SHI (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | A499872B |
Browsing City Campus shelves, Shelving location: City Campus Main Collection Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Includes index.
Introduction -- Anderson v HM Advocate -- Discussion and issues -- Reassessing the Anderson principle -- Grant v HM Advocate -- Assistance from counsel or solicitors -- England and Wales -- Comparative cases from other jurisdictions -- Conclusion -- App.1. Guide to the professional conduct of advocates -- App.2. The Law Society of Scotland Practice Rules 2011, rule C4: solicitor advocates.
Robert Shiels takes on the task of reinforcing the principles of the case of Anderson v HM Advocate in 1996, prior to which there were no grounds for appeal due to defective respresentation.
There are no comments on this title.
Log in to your account to post a comment.