Image from Coce

Feminist judgments : from theory to practice / edited by Rosemary Hunter, Clare McGlynn, and Erika Rackley [foreword by Brenda Hale].

Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextPublisher: Oxford ; Portland, Or. : Hart, 2010Description: xxxi, 471 pages ; 25 cmContent type:
  • text
Media type:
  • unmediated
Carrier type:
  • volume
ISBN:
  • 1849460531
  • 9781849460538
Subject(s): DDC classification:
  • 347.077082 22
LOC classification:
  • KD734 .F458 2010
Contents:
Feminist judgments : an introduction / Rosemary Hunter, Clare McGlynn & Erika Rackley -- An account of feminist judging / Rosemary Hunter -- The art and craft of writing judgments : notes on the feminist judgments project / Erika Rackley -- Evans v Amicus Healthcare Ltd / Sally Sheldon (commentary), Sonia Harris-Short (judgment) -- Re N (a child) / Emily Jackson (commentary), Samantha Ashenden (judgment) -- Re G (children) (residence : same-sex partner) / Daniel Monk (commentary), Alison Diduck (judgment) -- Re L (a child) (contact : domestic violence) / Christine Piper (commentary), Felicity Kaganas (judgment) -- Re A (children) (conjoined twins : surgical separation) / Richard Huxtable (commentary), Geralding Hastings (judgment) -- Royal Bank of Scotland Plc v Etridge (no 2) / Alison Diduck (commentary), Rosemary Auchmuty (judgment) -- Porter v Commissioner of police for the metropolis / Maureen O'Sullivan (commentary), Anna Grear (judgment) -- Baird textile holdings v Marks & Spencer plc / John Wightman (commentary), Linda Mulcahy & Cathy Andrews (judgment) -- R v A (no 2) / Louise Ellison (commentary), Clare McGlynn (judgment) -- R v Stone and Dobinson / Neil Cobb (commentary), Lois Bibbings (judgment) -- R v Brown / Matthew Weait & Rosemary Hunter (commentary), Robin Mackenzie (judgment) -- R v Dhaliwal / Mandy Burton (commentary), Vanessa Munro & Sangeeta Shah (judgment) -- R v Zoora (Ghulam) Shah / Susan Edwards (commentary), Samia Bano & Pragna Patel (judgment) -- Attorney-general for Jersey v Holley / Clare Connelly (commentary), Susan Edwards (judgment) -- YL v Birmingham City Council and others / Morag McDermont (commentary), Helen Carr & Caroline Hunter (judgment) -- R (Begum) v governors of Denbigh High School / Holly Cullen (commentary), Maleiha Malik (judgment) -- Sheffield City Council v E / Jonathan Herring (commentary), Nicola Barker & Marie Fox (judgment) -- R v Portsmouth Hospitals NHS trust, ex parte Glass / Anne Morris (commentary), Jo Bridgeman (judgment) -- Roberts v Hopwood / Stephanie Palmer (commentary), Harriet Samuels (judgment) -- Mundon v Del Monte Foods Ltd / Gwyneth Pitt (commentary), Rachel Horton & Grace James (judgment) -- James v Eastleigh Borough Council / Joanne Conaghan (commentary), Aileen McColgan (judgment) -- Wilkinson v Kitzinger / Karon Monaghan (commentary), Rosie Hardinger (judgment) -- EM (Lebanon) v Secretary of State for the Home Department / Judy Walsh (commentary), Karon Monaghan (judgment).
Summary: While feminist legal scholarship has generated comprehensive critiques of existing legal doctrine, there has been little opportunity to test or apply feminist knowledge in practice. In this book, a group of feminist legal scholars put theory into practice in judgment form, by writing the 'missing' feminist judgments in key cases.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Date due Barcode
Book City Campus City Campus Main Collection 347.077082 FEM (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available A439443B

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Feminist judgments : an introduction / Rosemary Hunter, Clare McGlynn & Erika Rackley -- An account of feminist judging / Rosemary Hunter -- The art and craft of writing judgments : notes on the feminist judgments project / Erika Rackley -- Evans v Amicus Healthcare Ltd / Sally Sheldon (commentary), Sonia Harris-Short (judgment) -- Re N (a child) / Emily Jackson (commentary), Samantha Ashenden (judgment) -- Re G (children) (residence : same-sex partner) / Daniel Monk (commentary), Alison Diduck (judgment) -- Re L (a child) (contact : domestic violence) / Christine Piper (commentary), Felicity Kaganas (judgment) -- Re A (children) (conjoined twins : surgical separation) / Richard Huxtable (commentary), Geralding Hastings (judgment) -- Royal Bank of Scotland Plc v Etridge (no 2) / Alison Diduck (commentary), Rosemary Auchmuty (judgment) -- Porter v Commissioner of police for the metropolis / Maureen O'Sullivan (commentary), Anna Grear (judgment) -- Baird textile holdings v Marks & Spencer plc / John Wightman (commentary), Linda Mulcahy & Cathy Andrews (judgment) -- R v A (no 2) / Louise Ellison (commentary), Clare McGlynn (judgment) -- R v Stone and Dobinson / Neil Cobb (commentary), Lois Bibbings (judgment) -- R v Brown / Matthew Weait & Rosemary Hunter (commentary), Robin Mackenzie (judgment) -- R v Dhaliwal / Mandy Burton (commentary), Vanessa Munro & Sangeeta Shah (judgment) -- R v Zoora (Ghulam) Shah / Susan Edwards (commentary), Samia Bano & Pragna Patel (judgment) -- Attorney-general for Jersey v Holley / Clare Connelly (commentary), Susan Edwards (judgment) -- YL v Birmingham City Council and others / Morag McDermont (commentary), Helen Carr & Caroline Hunter (judgment) -- R (Begum) v governors of Denbigh High School / Holly Cullen (commentary), Maleiha Malik (judgment) -- Sheffield City Council v E / Jonathan Herring (commentary), Nicola Barker & Marie Fox (judgment) -- R v Portsmouth Hospitals NHS trust, ex parte Glass / Anne Morris (commentary), Jo Bridgeman (judgment) -- Roberts v Hopwood / Stephanie Palmer (commentary), Harriet Samuels (judgment) -- Mundon v Del Monte Foods Ltd / Gwyneth Pitt (commentary), Rachel Horton & Grace James (judgment) -- James v Eastleigh Borough Council / Joanne Conaghan (commentary), Aileen McColgan (judgment) -- Wilkinson v Kitzinger / Karon Monaghan (commentary), Rosie Hardinger (judgment) -- EM (Lebanon) v Secretary of State for the Home Department / Judy Walsh (commentary), Karon Monaghan (judgment).

While feminist legal scholarship has generated comprehensive critiques of existing legal doctrine, there has been little opportunity to test or apply feminist knowledge in practice. In this book, a group of feminist legal scholars put theory into practice in judgment form, by writing the 'missing' feminist judgments in key cases.

Machine converted from AACR2 source record.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Powered by Koha