Image from Coce

Private property and abuse of rights in Victorian England : the story of Edward Pickles and the Bradford water supply / Michael Taggart.

By: Material type: TextTextSeries: Oxford studies in modern legal historyPublisher: Oxford ; New York : Oxford University Press, 2002Description: xxiii, 235 pages : illustrations, maps ; 25 cmContent type:
  • text
Media type:
  • unmediated
Carrier type:
  • volume
ISBN:
  • 019925687X
  • 9780199256877
Other title:
  • Story of Edward Pickles and the Bradford water supply
Subject(s): DDC classification:
  • 346.420432 22
LOC classification:
  • KD674 .T34 2002
Online resources:
Contents:
Prologue -- 1. Bradford and its Water Supply -- 2. Coal, Stone and Water and Many Wells Farm -- 3. To Court -- 4. Property and Statutory Interpretation -- 5. Property and Water -- 6. Abuse of Rights -- 7. Malice and the Law of Torts -- Epilogue: Pickles and the Public /Private Law Divide.
Summary: "The leading case of The Mayor, Alderman and Burgesses of the Borough of Bradford v Pickles was the first to establish the principle that it is not unlawful for a property owner to exercise his or her property rights maliciously and to the detriment of others or the public interest. Though controversial at the time, today it is often invisible and taken for granted. This book explores why the common law, i contrast to civil law systems, developed in this way.; During the industrial revolution, the town of Bradford, and with it the demand for water for industrial and domestic purposes, grew rapidly. The first part of the book explores through an analysis of correspondence, records, and newspaper reports, the development of the Bradford water supply and the genesis of the dispute that ultimately flare into litigation at the end of the nineteenth century.; Several aspects of the case are of enduring doctrinal importance 100 years on. The controversial and potent common law principle of interpreting statutes so as to protect property rights wherever possible is examined in depth, as is the legal uncertainty of subterranean water rights in the nineteenth century. Finally the book attempts to explain the common lawyers' refusal to recognize a Continental-style doctrine of abuse of rights and the courts' failure to develop a prima face tort doctrine to curb maliciously inspired behavior."--Publisher description.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Date due Barcode
Book City Campus City Campus Main Collection 346.420432 TAG (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available A377318B

Includes bibliographical references (pages 213-232) and index.

Prologue -- 1. Bradford and its Water Supply -- 2. Coal, Stone and Water and Many Wells Farm -- 3. To Court -- 4. Property and Statutory Interpretation -- 5. Property and Water -- 6. Abuse of Rights -- 7. Malice and the Law of Torts -- Epilogue: Pickles and the Public /Private Law Divide.

"The leading case of The Mayor, Alderman and Burgesses of the Borough of Bradford v Pickles was the first to establish the principle that it is not unlawful for a property owner to exercise his or her property rights maliciously and to the detriment of others or the public interest. Though controversial at the time, today it is often invisible and taken for granted. This book explores why the common law, i contrast to civil law systems, developed in this way.; During the industrial revolution, the town of Bradford, and with it the demand for water for industrial and domestic purposes, grew rapidly. The first part of the book explores through an analysis of correspondence, records, and newspaper reports, the development of the Bradford water supply and the genesis of the dispute that ultimately flare into litigation at the end of the nineteenth century.; Several aspects of the case are of enduring doctrinal importance 100 years on. The controversial and potent common law principle of interpreting statutes so as to protect property rights wherever possible is examined in depth, as is the legal uncertainty of subterranean water rights in the nineteenth century. Finally the book attempts to explain the common lawyers' refusal to recognize a Continental-style doctrine of abuse of rights and the courts' failure to develop a prima face tort doctrine to curb maliciously inspired behavior."--Publisher description.

Machine converted from AACR2 source record.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Powered by Koha