| Formatted contents note |
Eyewitness, memory, and the law -- Loftus, E. F. (2002). Memory faults and fixes. Issues in Science and Technology, 18, 41-50 -- Dysart, J. E., Lindsay, R.C.L., MacDonald, T. K., & Wicke, C. (2002). The intoxicated witness : effects of alcohol on identification accuracy from show-ups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 170-175 -- Wells, G. L., Small, M., Penrod, S., Malpass, R. S., Fulero, S. M., & Brimacombe, C. A. E. (1998). Eyewitness identification procedures : recommendations for lineups and photospreads. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 603-647 -- Levi, A. M., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (2001). Lineup and photo spread procedures : issues concerning policy recommendations. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 776-790 -- Memon, A., Wark, L., Holley, A., Bull, R., & Koehnken, G. (1997). Eyewitness performance in cognitive and structured interviews. Memory, 5, 639-656 -- Penrod, S., & Cutler, B. (1995). Witness confidence and witness accuracy : assessing their forensic relation. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1, 817-845 -- Goodman, G. S., & Schaaf, J. M. (1997). Over a decade of research on children's eyewitness testimony : what have we learned? where do we go from here? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, S5-s20 -- Ekman, P., & O'Sullivan, M. (1991). Who can catch a liar? American Psychologist, 46, 913-920 -- Mann, S., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (2004). Detecting true lies : police officers' ability to detect suspects' lies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 137-149 -- Fiedler, K., Schmid, J., & Stahl, T. (2002). What is the current truth about polygraph lie detection. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 24, 313-324 -- Kassin, S. M. (2005). On the psychology of confessions : does innocence put innocents at risk? American Psychologist, 60, 215-228 -- Olson, E. A., & Wells, G. L. (2004). What makes a good alibi? A proposed taxonomy. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 157-176 -- Steblay, N. M., Besirevic, J., Fulero, S. M., & Jimenez-Lorente, B. (1999). The effects of pretrial publicity on juror verdicts : a meta-analytic review. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 219-235 -- Dolnik, L., Case, T. I., & Williams, K. D. (2003). Stealing thunder as a courtroom tactic revisited : processes and boundaries. Law and Human Behavior, 27, 267-287 -- Collett, M. E., & Kovera, M. B. (2003). The effects of British and American trial procedures on the quality of juror decision-making. Law and Human Behavior, 27, 403-422 -- Martin, A.M., Kaplan, M.F. & Alamo, J.M. (2003). Discussion content and perception of deliberation in western European versus American juries. Psychology, Crime & Law, 9, 247-263 -- Hannaford, P. L., Hans, V. P., & Munsterman, G. T. (2000). Permitting jury discussions during trial : impact of the Arizona reform. Law & Human Behavior, 24, 359-382 -- Sommers, S. R. (2006). On racial diversity and group decision making : Identifying multiple effects of racial composition on jury deliberations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 597-612 -- Greene, E., & Loftus, E. F. (1998). Psycholegal research on jury damage awards. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 50-54 -- Saks, M. J., Hallinger, L. A., Wissler R. L., Evans, D. L. & Hart, A. J. (1997). Reducing variability in civil jury awards. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 243-256 -- Adamou, M. C., & Hale, A. S. (2003). PTSD and the law of psychiatric injury in England and Wales : finally coming closer? Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 31, 327-332 -- Haney C. (2003). Mental health issues in long-term solitary and "supermax" confinement. Crime and Delinquency, 49, 124-156 -- Kovera, M. B., Russano, M. B., & McAuliff, B. D. (2002). Assessment of the commonsense psychology underlying Daubert : Legal decision makers' abilities to evaluate expert evidence in hostile work environment cases. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 8, 180-200 -- Saks, M. J. (1990). Expert witnesses, nonexpert witnesses, and nonwitness experts. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 291-313 -- Shuman, D. W., & Greenberg, S. A. (2003). The expert witness, the adversary system, and the voice of reason : Reconciling impartiality and advocacy. Professional Psychology : Research and Practice, 34, 219-224 -- Malsch, M., & Freckelton, I. (2005). Expert bias and partisanship : a comparison between Australia and the Netherlands. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 42-61 -- Roesch, R., Golding, S. L., & Hans, V. P., & Reppucci, N. D. (1991). Social science and the courts : the role of amicus curiae briefs. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 1-11 -- Monahan, J., & Walker, L. (1988). Social science research in law : A new paradigm. American Psychologist, 43, 465-472 -- Haney, C. (1993). Psychology and legal change : the impact of a decade. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 371-398. |
