Judicial review handbook /
Fordham, Michael,
Judicial review handbook / by Michael Fordham ; foreword by Lord Woolf. - Fifth edition. - xix, 847 pages ; 25 cm
Previous ed.: 2004.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Nature of Judicial Review -- Practical Steps -- Basic steps in a judicial review case -- Supervisory Jurisdiction -- Supervising public authorities -- Importance and range of subject-matter -- Terminology -- The Administrative Court -- Some special procedural aspects -- Strict case-management -- Impact -- Remittal and repeatability -- Sterile /counterproductive victories -- Judicial review as a monetary springboard -- Securing assurances /provoking comment -- Wider impact /knock-on effect -- Materiality -- Practical substance and judicial review -- Materiality /material flaw -- Lack of prejudice -- Futility -- Dangers of materiality, prejudice and futility -- Hypothetical /academic issues -- Prematurity -- Targets -- Judicial review and “decisions” -- Spectrum of possible targets -- Multiple targets /target-selection -- Power Sources -- Powers /duties: basic sources and hierarchy -- Policy guidance -- International law -- Constitutional Fundamentals -- Legislative supremacy -- Rule of law /separation of powers -- Principles of legality -- Access to justice -- Constitutional /common law rights -- Basic fairness -- Basic reasonableness -- Ec Law -- EC law supremacy -- EC Treaty rights -- Judicial review for EC-incompatibility -- Article 234 references to the ECJ -- EC law damages /reparation -- The Hra -- HRA: key features and themes -- Codified Convention rights -- HRA ss.3 - 4: legislative compatibility /DOI -- HRA s.6: compatible public authority action -- HRA just satisfaction -- Cooperation& Candour -- A cooperative enterprise -- ADR /mediation -- Claimant's duty of candour -- Defendant /interested party's duty of candour -- Precedent& Authority -- Use of case-law -- Academic commentary /comparative case-law -- Vigilance -- Judicial review and the rule of law -- Abuse Models -- Restraint -- “Soft” review: reasonableness -- Restraint and factual questions -- Restraint and discretion /judgment -- Restraint and expertise -- Judicial restraint in action -- Protecting public authorities -- Review from the decision-maker's point of view -- Balancing -- Judicial review and striking a balance -- Striking a balance: grounds for judicial review -- Holding the balance: nothing personal -- Convenience and floodgates -- The Forbidden Method -- “Soft” review: the forbidden substitutionary approach -- “Not an appeal” -- “Legality not correctness” -- “Not the merits” -- “Court does not substitute its own judgment” -- Hard-Edged Questions -- Hard-edged review: correctness -- Precedent fact -- Error of law as hard-edged review -- Interpretation as a hard-edged question -- Procedural fairness as hard-edged review -- Hard-edged review: further matters -- Evidence and Fact -- Judicial review evidence -- Fresh evidence in judicial review -- Judicial review and factual disputes -- Disclosure, further information and cross-examination -- Costs -- Costs: general matters -- Summary assessment /detailed assessment of costs -- Costs and the permission stage -- Costs and the public interest -- Costs and discontinuance /early disposal -- Special costs responses -- Making the Claim -- Pre-claim steps -- Making the claim -- Acknowledging the claim -- Interim Remedies -- Interim remedies -- The balance of convenience -- Permission -- Granting or refusing permission -- Case-management at the permission stage -- Substantive Hearing -- Post-permission /pre-hearing steps -- Third party participation -- Disposal without a hearing -- The substantive hearing -- Appeal -- Permission appeal -- Substantive appeal -- Remedies -- Unified remedies -- The declaration -- Remedy as a discretionary matter -- The remedies in action -- Monetary Remedies -- Availability of debt, restitution and damages -- No damages for maladministration -- Recognised species of reparation claim -- Section A. Part 1. 1.1. Part 2. 2.1. 2.2. 2.3. 2.4. 2.5. 2.6. Part 3. 3.1. 3.2. 3.3. 3.4. 3.5. Part 4. 4.1. 4.2. 4.3. 4.4. 4.5. 4.6. 4.7. Part 5. 5.1. 5.2. 5.3. Part 6. 6.1. 6.2. 6.3. Part 7. 7.1. 7.2. 7.3. 7.4. 7.5. 7.6. 7.7. Part 8. 8.1. 8.2. 8.3. 8.4. 8.5. Part 9. 9.1. 9.2. 9.3. 9.4. 9.5. Part 10. 10.1. 10.2. 10.3. 10.4. Part 11. 11.1. 11.2. Part 12. 12.1. 12.2. Part 13. 13.1. 13.2. 13.3. 13.4. 13.5. 13.6. 13.7. Part 14. 14.1. 14.2. 14.3. 14.4. Part 15. 15.1. 15.2. 15.3. 15.4. 15.5. Part 16. 16.1. 16.2. 16.3. 16.4. 16.5. 16.6. Part 17. 17.1. 17.2. 17.3. 17.4. Part 18. 18.1. 18.2. 18.3. 18.4. 18.5. 18.6. Part 19. 19.1. 19.2. 19.3. Part 20. 20.1. 20.2. Part 21. 21.1. 21.2. Part 22. 22.1. 22.2. 22.3. 22.4. Part 23. 23.1. 23.2. Part 24. 24.1. 24.2. 24.3. 24.4. Part 25. 25.1. 25.2. 25.3. Parameters of Judicial Review -- Delay -- The approach to delay -- Promptness and the running of time -- Good reason to extend time -- Hardship, prejudice and detriment -- Public /Private -- The public /private distinction -- Public law principles outside CPR 54 -- Procedural exclusivity: abuse of process -- Ouster -- The approach to legislative preclusive clauses -- Time-limit ousters -- Interpretation -- The purposive approach to interpretation -- Legislative purpose and judicial review -- Statutory interpretation -- Using Hansard -- Interpreting other sources -- Function -- Understanding the defendant's function -- Traditional functional labels -- The judicial /administrative distinction -- Other aspects of function -- Context -- Contextualism -- Circumstances -- Characteristics and conduct of the claimant -- Claimant's failure to complain /raise the concern at the time -- The Court's controlling discretion /judgment -- “Flexi-principles” -- Modified Review -- Part-reviewability of Crown Courts -- Judicial review of decisions regarding legal process -- Anxious scrutiny -- Other modified review situations -- Flux -- The developing law -- Lessons from the past -- “Two-stage” approaches to legal development -- Forecasting -- Reviewability -- Surveying the field -- Principles of reviewability -- Conquests of reviewability -- Non-Reviewability -- Special functions and immunity from review -- Private law matters -- Alternative Remedy -- General effect of other safeguards -- Exclusive alternative remedy -- Alternative remedy and discretion /case-management -- Other remedy curing public law wrong -- Proportionality Template -- Proportionality principles -- Standing -- The requirement of sufficient interest -- The approach to sufficient interest -- Standing at the permission /substantive stages -- Standing under the HRA: the victim test -- Discretion /Duty -- No unfettered powers -- Discretion /power: the essential duties -- Discretion and duty in action -- Inalienability -- Preservation of powers and duties -- Inalienability and estoppel /legitimate expectation -- Legitimate Expectation -- The role of legitimate expectation -- Basic anatomy of a legitimate expectation -- Onus -- Onus generally on the claimant -- Onus on the defendant in particular contexts -- Severance -- Severability -- Nullity -- Invalidity labels -- Flaws constituting “nullity” -- Purpose /effect of “nullity” -- Section B. Part 26. 26.1. 26.2. 26.3. 26.4. Part 27. 27.1. 27.2. 27.3. Part 28. 28.1. 28.2. Part 29. 29.1. 29.2. 29.3. 29.4. 29.5. Part 30. 30.1. 30.2. 30.3. 30.4. Part 31. 31.1. 31.2. 31.3. 31.4. 31.5. 31.6. Part 32. 32.1. 32.2. 32.3. 32.4. Part 33. 33.1. 33.2. 33.3. 33.4. Part 34. 34.1. 34.2. 34.3. Part 35. 35.1. 35.2. Part 36. 36.1. 36.2. 36.3. 36.4. Part 37. 37.1. Part 38. 38.1. 38.2. 38.3. 38.4. Part 39. 39.1. 39.2. 39.3. Part 40. 40.1. 40.2. Part 41. 41.1. 41.2. Part 42. 42.1. 42.2. Part 43. 43.1. Part 44. 44.1. 44.2. 44.3. Grounds for Judicial Review -- Classifying Grounds -- The conventional threefold division -- Root concepts and unifying themes -- Reviewing discretion: Wednesbury and abuse of power -- Overlapping grounds and interchangeable labels -- Ultra Vires -- Basic meanings of ultra vires -- Rights-violation as ultra vires: the principle of legality -- Interpretation to allow validity: reading down /reading in -- Jurisdictional Error -- Jurisdiction /jurisdictional error as a flexi-principle -- Jurisdictional error as hard-edged review (correctness) -- Error of law and jurisdictional error -- Error of Law -- Error of law /misdirection in law -- Error of law: restricted categories -- Error of Fact -- Precendent Fact -- Fundamental error of fact -- Abdication /Fetter -- Basic duty not to abdicate /fetter -- Acting under dictation -- Improper delegation -- Fetter by inflexible policy -- Insufficient Inquiry -- Duty of sufficient inquiry -- Whether material fairly presented /properly addressed -- Bad Faith /Improper Motive -- Bad faith -- Improper motive -- Frustrating the Legislative Purpose -- Duty to promote the legislative purpose -- Substantive Unfairness -- Substantive unfairness -- Unjustified breach of a substantive legitimate expectation -- Inconsistency -- Equal treatment, non-arbitrariness and certainty -- Unjustified departure -- Relevancy /Irrelevancy -- The relevancy /irrelevancy principle -- Obligatory and discretionary relevance -- Relevance and weight -- Unreasonableness -- The unreasonableness principle -- High threshold epithets -- Species of unreasonableness -- Unreasonableness in action -- Proportionality -- Proportionality and the common law -- Proportionality as part of reasonableness -- Common law proportionality: rights and penalties -- Proportionality and scrutiny of evidence /reasoning -- Latitude and intensity of review -- Hra-Violation -- Testing for an HRA-violation -- Article 2: life -- Article 3: cruelty -- Article 5: liberty -- Article 6: fair-hearing -- Article 8: privacy -- Article 10: expression -- Article 14: non-discrimination -- Article 1P: property-interference -- Further Convention rights and provisions -- Procedural Unfairness -- The basic concept of fairness -- Procedural fairness as a flexi-principle -- Procedural fairness: supplementing the legislative scheme -- Procedural ultra vires -- The basic right to be heard -- Adequate consultation -- The basic right to be informed -- Other rights of procedural fairness -- Bias -- Automatic disqualification -- Actual bias -- Apparent bias -- Reasons -- Importance of reasons in the developing law -- Judicial review for failure to give reasons -- Adequacy of reasons -- Timing of reasons -- Remedy for lack /insufficiency of reasons -- External Wrongs -- External wrongs -- Section C. Part 45. 45.1. 45.2. 45.3. 45.4. Part 46. 46.1. 46.2. 46.3. Part 47. 47.1. 47.2. 47.3. Part 48. 48.1. 48.2. Part 49. 49.1. 49.2. Part 50. 50.1. 50.2. 50.3. 50.4. Part 51. 51.1. 51.2. Part 52. 52.1. 52.2. Part 53. 53.1. Part 54. 54.1. 54.2. Part 55. 55.1. 55.2. Part 56. 56.1. 56.2. 56.3. Part 57. 57.1. 57.2. 57.3. 57.4. Part 58. 58.1. 58.2. 58.3. 58.4. 58.5. Part 59. 59.1. 59.2. 59.3. 59.4. 59.5. 59.6. 59.7. 59.8. 59.9. 59.10. Part 60. 60.1. 60.2. 60.3. 60.4. 60.5. 60.6. 60.7. 60.8. Part 61. 61.1. 61.2. 61.3. Part 62. 62.1. 62.2. 62.3. 62.4. 62.5. Part 63. 63.1. Materials -- Supreme Court Act 1981 s.31 -- Civil Procedure Rules PART 54(I) -- Civil Procedure Rules PART 54 Practice Direction -- Administrative Court Office Notes for Guidance -- Judicial Review Pre-Action Protocol -- Judicial Review Urgent Cases Procedure -- Human Rights Act 1998 -- Form N461 -- Form N462 -- Form N463 -- A List of Articles. Section D. 64.1. 64.2. 64.3. 64.4. 64.5. 64.6. 64.7. 64.8. 64.9. 64.10. 64.11.
"The Judicial Review Handbook is one of the leading works in public law, an indispensable source of reference and a guide to the burgeoning case law in judicial review. Established as an essential part of the library of any practitioner engaged in public law cases, the Judicial Review Handbook offers unrivalled coverage of administrative law, including, but not confined to the work of the Administrative Court and its procedures. But as anyone who has used the previous editions will acknowledge, it is much more than that. The completely revised and up-dated fifth edition is once again structured around 63 unique legal principles supported by a compendious compilation of sources and an unequalled selection of reported case quotations. It also includes essential procedural rules, forms and guidance issued by the Administrative Court. This edition builds on previous editions with deepened coverage of the impact on judicial review of both the Civil Procedure Rules and the Human Rights Act 1998 which, at the time of the previous edition, were both new arrivals in English law. Their impact, and the plethora of cases which explore their meaning and application, are fully analysed and evaluated by Michael Fordham, and quotations from the cases incorporated into the unique appendices of case extracts."--Publisher's website.
184113824X 9781841138244
Judicial review--England
Judicial review--Wales
Judicial review of administrative acts--Great Britain--Digests
KD4902 / .F67 2008
347.42012
Judicial review handbook / by Michael Fordham ; foreword by Lord Woolf. - Fifth edition. - xix, 847 pages ; 25 cm
Previous ed.: 2004.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Nature of Judicial Review -- Practical Steps -- Basic steps in a judicial review case -- Supervisory Jurisdiction -- Supervising public authorities -- Importance and range of subject-matter -- Terminology -- The Administrative Court -- Some special procedural aspects -- Strict case-management -- Impact -- Remittal and repeatability -- Sterile /counterproductive victories -- Judicial review as a monetary springboard -- Securing assurances /provoking comment -- Wider impact /knock-on effect -- Materiality -- Practical substance and judicial review -- Materiality /material flaw -- Lack of prejudice -- Futility -- Dangers of materiality, prejudice and futility -- Hypothetical /academic issues -- Prematurity -- Targets -- Judicial review and “decisions” -- Spectrum of possible targets -- Multiple targets /target-selection -- Power Sources -- Powers /duties: basic sources and hierarchy -- Policy guidance -- International law -- Constitutional Fundamentals -- Legislative supremacy -- Rule of law /separation of powers -- Principles of legality -- Access to justice -- Constitutional /common law rights -- Basic fairness -- Basic reasonableness -- Ec Law -- EC law supremacy -- EC Treaty rights -- Judicial review for EC-incompatibility -- Article 234 references to the ECJ -- EC law damages /reparation -- The Hra -- HRA: key features and themes -- Codified Convention rights -- HRA ss.3 - 4: legislative compatibility /DOI -- HRA s.6: compatible public authority action -- HRA just satisfaction -- Cooperation& Candour -- A cooperative enterprise -- ADR /mediation -- Claimant's duty of candour -- Defendant /interested party's duty of candour -- Precedent& Authority -- Use of case-law -- Academic commentary /comparative case-law -- Vigilance -- Judicial review and the rule of law -- Abuse Models -- Restraint -- “Soft” review: reasonableness -- Restraint and factual questions -- Restraint and discretion /judgment -- Restraint and expertise -- Judicial restraint in action -- Protecting public authorities -- Review from the decision-maker's point of view -- Balancing -- Judicial review and striking a balance -- Striking a balance: grounds for judicial review -- Holding the balance: nothing personal -- Convenience and floodgates -- The Forbidden Method -- “Soft” review: the forbidden substitutionary approach -- “Not an appeal” -- “Legality not correctness” -- “Not the merits” -- “Court does not substitute its own judgment” -- Hard-Edged Questions -- Hard-edged review: correctness -- Precedent fact -- Error of law as hard-edged review -- Interpretation as a hard-edged question -- Procedural fairness as hard-edged review -- Hard-edged review: further matters -- Evidence and Fact -- Judicial review evidence -- Fresh evidence in judicial review -- Judicial review and factual disputes -- Disclosure, further information and cross-examination -- Costs -- Costs: general matters -- Summary assessment /detailed assessment of costs -- Costs and the permission stage -- Costs and the public interest -- Costs and discontinuance /early disposal -- Special costs responses -- Making the Claim -- Pre-claim steps -- Making the claim -- Acknowledging the claim -- Interim Remedies -- Interim remedies -- The balance of convenience -- Permission -- Granting or refusing permission -- Case-management at the permission stage -- Substantive Hearing -- Post-permission /pre-hearing steps -- Third party participation -- Disposal without a hearing -- The substantive hearing -- Appeal -- Permission appeal -- Substantive appeal -- Remedies -- Unified remedies -- The declaration -- Remedy as a discretionary matter -- The remedies in action -- Monetary Remedies -- Availability of debt, restitution and damages -- No damages for maladministration -- Recognised species of reparation claim -- Section A. Part 1. 1.1. Part 2. 2.1. 2.2. 2.3. 2.4. 2.5. 2.6. Part 3. 3.1. 3.2. 3.3. 3.4. 3.5. Part 4. 4.1. 4.2. 4.3. 4.4. 4.5. 4.6. 4.7. Part 5. 5.1. 5.2. 5.3. Part 6. 6.1. 6.2. 6.3. Part 7. 7.1. 7.2. 7.3. 7.4. 7.5. 7.6. 7.7. Part 8. 8.1. 8.2. 8.3. 8.4. 8.5. Part 9. 9.1. 9.2. 9.3. 9.4. 9.5. Part 10. 10.1. 10.2. 10.3. 10.4. Part 11. 11.1. 11.2. Part 12. 12.1. 12.2. Part 13. 13.1. 13.2. 13.3. 13.4. 13.5. 13.6. 13.7. Part 14. 14.1. 14.2. 14.3. 14.4. Part 15. 15.1. 15.2. 15.3. 15.4. 15.5. Part 16. 16.1. 16.2. 16.3. 16.4. 16.5. 16.6. Part 17. 17.1. 17.2. 17.3. 17.4. Part 18. 18.1. 18.2. 18.3. 18.4. 18.5. 18.6. Part 19. 19.1. 19.2. 19.3. Part 20. 20.1. 20.2. Part 21. 21.1. 21.2. Part 22. 22.1. 22.2. 22.3. 22.4. Part 23. 23.1. 23.2. Part 24. 24.1. 24.2. 24.3. 24.4. Part 25. 25.1. 25.2. 25.3. Parameters of Judicial Review -- Delay -- The approach to delay -- Promptness and the running of time -- Good reason to extend time -- Hardship, prejudice and detriment -- Public /Private -- The public /private distinction -- Public law principles outside CPR 54 -- Procedural exclusivity: abuse of process -- Ouster -- The approach to legislative preclusive clauses -- Time-limit ousters -- Interpretation -- The purposive approach to interpretation -- Legislative purpose and judicial review -- Statutory interpretation -- Using Hansard -- Interpreting other sources -- Function -- Understanding the defendant's function -- Traditional functional labels -- The judicial /administrative distinction -- Other aspects of function -- Context -- Contextualism -- Circumstances -- Characteristics and conduct of the claimant -- Claimant's failure to complain /raise the concern at the time -- The Court's controlling discretion /judgment -- “Flexi-principles” -- Modified Review -- Part-reviewability of Crown Courts -- Judicial review of decisions regarding legal process -- Anxious scrutiny -- Other modified review situations -- Flux -- The developing law -- Lessons from the past -- “Two-stage” approaches to legal development -- Forecasting -- Reviewability -- Surveying the field -- Principles of reviewability -- Conquests of reviewability -- Non-Reviewability -- Special functions and immunity from review -- Private law matters -- Alternative Remedy -- General effect of other safeguards -- Exclusive alternative remedy -- Alternative remedy and discretion /case-management -- Other remedy curing public law wrong -- Proportionality Template -- Proportionality principles -- Standing -- The requirement of sufficient interest -- The approach to sufficient interest -- Standing at the permission /substantive stages -- Standing under the HRA: the victim test -- Discretion /Duty -- No unfettered powers -- Discretion /power: the essential duties -- Discretion and duty in action -- Inalienability -- Preservation of powers and duties -- Inalienability and estoppel /legitimate expectation -- Legitimate Expectation -- The role of legitimate expectation -- Basic anatomy of a legitimate expectation -- Onus -- Onus generally on the claimant -- Onus on the defendant in particular contexts -- Severance -- Severability -- Nullity -- Invalidity labels -- Flaws constituting “nullity” -- Purpose /effect of “nullity” -- Section B. Part 26. 26.1. 26.2. 26.3. 26.4. Part 27. 27.1. 27.2. 27.3. Part 28. 28.1. 28.2. Part 29. 29.1. 29.2. 29.3. 29.4. 29.5. Part 30. 30.1. 30.2. 30.3. 30.4. Part 31. 31.1. 31.2. 31.3. 31.4. 31.5. 31.6. Part 32. 32.1. 32.2. 32.3. 32.4. Part 33. 33.1. 33.2. 33.3. 33.4. Part 34. 34.1. 34.2. 34.3. Part 35. 35.1. 35.2. Part 36. 36.1. 36.2. 36.3. 36.4. Part 37. 37.1. Part 38. 38.1. 38.2. 38.3. 38.4. Part 39. 39.1. 39.2. 39.3. Part 40. 40.1. 40.2. Part 41. 41.1. 41.2. Part 42. 42.1. 42.2. Part 43. 43.1. Part 44. 44.1. 44.2. 44.3. Grounds for Judicial Review -- Classifying Grounds -- The conventional threefold division -- Root concepts and unifying themes -- Reviewing discretion: Wednesbury and abuse of power -- Overlapping grounds and interchangeable labels -- Ultra Vires -- Basic meanings of ultra vires -- Rights-violation as ultra vires: the principle of legality -- Interpretation to allow validity: reading down /reading in -- Jurisdictional Error -- Jurisdiction /jurisdictional error as a flexi-principle -- Jurisdictional error as hard-edged review (correctness) -- Error of law and jurisdictional error -- Error of Law -- Error of law /misdirection in law -- Error of law: restricted categories -- Error of Fact -- Precendent Fact -- Fundamental error of fact -- Abdication /Fetter -- Basic duty not to abdicate /fetter -- Acting under dictation -- Improper delegation -- Fetter by inflexible policy -- Insufficient Inquiry -- Duty of sufficient inquiry -- Whether material fairly presented /properly addressed -- Bad Faith /Improper Motive -- Bad faith -- Improper motive -- Frustrating the Legislative Purpose -- Duty to promote the legislative purpose -- Substantive Unfairness -- Substantive unfairness -- Unjustified breach of a substantive legitimate expectation -- Inconsistency -- Equal treatment, non-arbitrariness and certainty -- Unjustified departure -- Relevancy /Irrelevancy -- The relevancy /irrelevancy principle -- Obligatory and discretionary relevance -- Relevance and weight -- Unreasonableness -- The unreasonableness principle -- High threshold epithets -- Species of unreasonableness -- Unreasonableness in action -- Proportionality -- Proportionality and the common law -- Proportionality as part of reasonableness -- Common law proportionality: rights and penalties -- Proportionality and scrutiny of evidence /reasoning -- Latitude and intensity of review -- Hra-Violation -- Testing for an HRA-violation -- Article 2: life -- Article 3: cruelty -- Article 5: liberty -- Article 6: fair-hearing -- Article 8: privacy -- Article 10: expression -- Article 14: non-discrimination -- Article 1P: property-interference -- Further Convention rights and provisions -- Procedural Unfairness -- The basic concept of fairness -- Procedural fairness as a flexi-principle -- Procedural fairness: supplementing the legislative scheme -- Procedural ultra vires -- The basic right to be heard -- Adequate consultation -- The basic right to be informed -- Other rights of procedural fairness -- Bias -- Automatic disqualification -- Actual bias -- Apparent bias -- Reasons -- Importance of reasons in the developing law -- Judicial review for failure to give reasons -- Adequacy of reasons -- Timing of reasons -- Remedy for lack /insufficiency of reasons -- External Wrongs -- External wrongs -- Section C. Part 45. 45.1. 45.2. 45.3. 45.4. Part 46. 46.1. 46.2. 46.3. Part 47. 47.1. 47.2. 47.3. Part 48. 48.1. 48.2. Part 49. 49.1. 49.2. Part 50. 50.1. 50.2. 50.3. 50.4. Part 51. 51.1. 51.2. Part 52. 52.1. 52.2. Part 53. 53.1. Part 54. 54.1. 54.2. Part 55. 55.1. 55.2. Part 56. 56.1. 56.2. 56.3. Part 57. 57.1. 57.2. 57.3. 57.4. Part 58. 58.1. 58.2. 58.3. 58.4. 58.5. Part 59. 59.1. 59.2. 59.3. 59.4. 59.5. 59.6. 59.7. 59.8. 59.9. 59.10. Part 60. 60.1. 60.2. 60.3. 60.4. 60.5. 60.6. 60.7. 60.8. Part 61. 61.1. 61.2. 61.3. Part 62. 62.1. 62.2. 62.3. 62.4. 62.5. Part 63. 63.1. Materials -- Supreme Court Act 1981 s.31 -- Civil Procedure Rules PART 54(I) -- Civil Procedure Rules PART 54 Practice Direction -- Administrative Court Office Notes for Guidance -- Judicial Review Pre-Action Protocol -- Judicial Review Urgent Cases Procedure -- Human Rights Act 1998 -- Form N461 -- Form N462 -- Form N463 -- A List of Articles. Section D. 64.1. 64.2. 64.3. 64.4. 64.5. 64.6. 64.7. 64.8. 64.9. 64.10. 64.11.
"The Judicial Review Handbook is one of the leading works in public law, an indispensable source of reference and a guide to the burgeoning case law in judicial review. Established as an essential part of the library of any practitioner engaged in public law cases, the Judicial Review Handbook offers unrivalled coverage of administrative law, including, but not confined to the work of the Administrative Court and its procedures. But as anyone who has used the previous editions will acknowledge, it is much more than that. The completely revised and up-dated fifth edition is once again structured around 63 unique legal principles supported by a compendious compilation of sources and an unequalled selection of reported case quotations. It also includes essential procedural rules, forms and guidance issued by the Administrative Court. This edition builds on previous editions with deepened coverage of the impact on judicial review of both the Civil Procedure Rules and the Human Rights Act 1998 which, at the time of the previous edition, were both new arrivals in English law. Their impact, and the plethora of cases which explore their meaning and application, are fully analysed and evaluated by Michael Fordham, and quotations from the cases incorporated into the unique appendices of case extracts."--Publisher's website.
184113824X 9781841138244
Judicial review--England
Judicial review--Wales
Judicial review of administrative acts--Great Britain--Digests
KD4902 / .F67 2008
347.42012