A systematic theory of argumentation : the pragma-dialectical approach /
Eemeren, F. H. van 1946-
A systematic theory of argumentation : the pragma-dialectical approach / Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst. - vii, 216 pages ; 24 cm
Includes bibliographical references and index.
1. Introduction -- 2. The realm of argumentation studies -- 3. A model of a critical discussion -- 4. Relevance -- 5. Analysis as reconstruction -- 6. Rules for a critical discussion -- 7. Fallacies -- -- Introduction -- The realm of argumentation studies -- A model of a critical discussion -- Relevance -- Analysis as reconstruction -- Rules for a critical discussion -- Fallacies -- A code of conduct for reasonable discussants. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.
"In A Systematic Theory of Argumentation, two of the leading figures in argumentation theory, Frans H. van Eemeren and Rob Grootendorst, present a view of argumentation as a means of resolving differences of opinion by testing the acceptability of the disputed positions. Their model of a "critical discussion" serves as a theoretical tool for analyzing, evaluating, and producing argumentative discourse. In this approach, pragmatic and dialectical insights are combined by conceiving a critical discussion as a methodological exchange of speech acts between two parties." "A Systematic Theory of Argumentation is a major contribution to the study of argumentation and will be of particular value to professionals and graduate students in speech communication, informal logic, rhetoric, critical thinking, linguistics, and philosophy."--Jacket. "In A Systematic Theory of Argumentation, two of the leading figures in argumentation theory, Frans H. van Eemeren and Rob Grootendorst, present a view of argumentation as a means of resolving differences of opinion by testing the acceptability of the disputed positions. Their model of a "critical discussion" serves as a theoretical tool for analyzing, evaluating, and producing argumentative discourse. In this approach, pragmatic and dialectical insights are combined by conceiving a critical discussion as a methodological exchange of speech acts between two parties." "A Systematic Theory of Argumentation is a major contribution to the study of argumentation and will be of particular value to professionals and graduate students in speech communication, informal logic, rhetoric, critical thinking, linguistics, and philosophy."--BOOK JACKET.
0521830753 9780521830751 052153772X 9780521537728
2003046181
Persuasion (Rhetoric)
Pragmatics
Dialectic
P301.5.P47 / G76 2004
808
A systematic theory of argumentation : the pragma-dialectical approach / Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst. - vii, 216 pages ; 24 cm
Includes bibliographical references and index.
1. Introduction -- 2. The realm of argumentation studies -- 3. A model of a critical discussion -- 4. Relevance -- 5. Analysis as reconstruction -- 6. Rules for a critical discussion -- 7. Fallacies -- -- Introduction -- The realm of argumentation studies -- A model of a critical discussion -- Relevance -- Analysis as reconstruction -- Rules for a critical discussion -- Fallacies -- A code of conduct for reasonable discussants. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.
"In A Systematic Theory of Argumentation, two of the leading figures in argumentation theory, Frans H. van Eemeren and Rob Grootendorst, present a view of argumentation as a means of resolving differences of opinion by testing the acceptability of the disputed positions. Their model of a "critical discussion" serves as a theoretical tool for analyzing, evaluating, and producing argumentative discourse. In this approach, pragmatic and dialectical insights are combined by conceiving a critical discussion as a methodological exchange of speech acts between two parties." "A Systematic Theory of Argumentation is a major contribution to the study of argumentation and will be of particular value to professionals and graduate students in speech communication, informal logic, rhetoric, critical thinking, linguistics, and philosophy."--Jacket. "In A Systematic Theory of Argumentation, two of the leading figures in argumentation theory, Frans H. van Eemeren and Rob Grootendorst, present a view of argumentation as a means of resolving differences of opinion by testing the acceptability of the disputed positions. Their model of a "critical discussion" serves as a theoretical tool for analyzing, evaluating, and producing argumentative discourse. In this approach, pragmatic and dialectical insights are combined by conceiving a critical discussion as a methodological exchange of speech acts between two parties." "A Systematic Theory of Argumentation is a major contribution to the study of argumentation and will be of particular value to professionals and graduate students in speech communication, informal logic, rhetoric, critical thinking, linguistics, and philosophy."--BOOK JACKET.
0521830753 9780521830751 052153772X 9780521537728
2003046181
Persuasion (Rhetoric)
Pragmatics
Dialectic
P301.5.P47 / G76 2004
808